On 20/10/2016 14:41, Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote:
> For testing-purposes I tried to simulate the situation in sidnlabs.nl:
>
> dig +dnssec -t ANY _sidn._dnssec-valcheck._1804289384.sidnlabs.nl
ERROR!
That should be:
dig +dnssec -t ANY _sidn._dnssec-valcheck._1804289384.dname.sidnlabs.nl
--
Ma
Hi,
I noticed some inconsistent behavior in a particular setup where a DNAME
is involved and I am trying to figure out who is right and who is wrong.
Players involved on the resolving side are:
Google Public DNS (resolves without an error)
BIND (often results in a timeout and a log-rule saying:
2 matches
Mail list logo
