On 05:12 19/12, Richard Doty wrote:
> Having text files makes editing easier, but you still want to keep the
> slaves the same - making the identical edit multiple times is some work,
> but may not actually happen depending on circumstances (people make
> mistakes)
>
> I like to make all the serve
Apart from master/slave now being Primary/Secondary (mindset change
after 25 years of DNS management)
... I kind of like the idea - except if the Primary server is DNSSEC
Signing that zone (and DNSSEC is a really smart thing to be able to do)
then editing a Secondary is not a very simple
Having text files makes editing easier, but you still want to keep the
slaves the same - making the identical edit multiple times is some work,
but may not actually happen depending on circumstances (people make
mistakes)
I like to make all the servers 'masters' - so whoever has the highest
serial
Warren, thanks a lotwith the masterfile-format clause it works OK.
Greetings!!!
El jue, 16 dic 2021 a las 15:43, Warren Kumari () escribió:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:37 AM Roberto Carna
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all, I have one BIND9 server as master and 3 as slaves.
>>
>> The master and
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:37 AM Roberto Carna
wrote:
> Dear all, I have one BIND9 server as master and 3 as slaves.
>
> The master and one slave are in a given site #1, and the other two
> slaves are in a geographical different site #2.
>
> In case site #1 goes offline, I need to edit records in
Dear all, I have one BIND9 server as master and 3 as slaves.
The master and one slave are in a given site #1, and the other two
slaves are in a geographical different site #2.
In case site #1 goes offline, I need to edit records in both slaves
from site #2, in order to point some services to othe
6 matches
Mail list logo
