In message <4bcf4a6c.8050...@gmail.com>, Dave Sparro writes:
> On 4/9/2010 8:59 PM, Steven Wilmot wrote:
> >
> > 1 - The original server-configuration (or response) from "primary-dns.co.uk
> "
> > is NOT VALID
> >
> > If this is the case, could you please help let me know exactly which RFC or
> >
On 4/9/2010 8:59 PM, Steven Wilmot wrote:
1 - The original server-configuration (or response) from "primary-dns.co.uk"
is NOT VALID
If this is the case, could you please help let me know exactly which RFC or
configuration that you believe is not valid.
Note: 'primary-dns.co.uk is owned and mai
At the top of this post I'd first like to thank Jonathan for a great reply
(which for some reason never seemed to make it onto the usenet mirror of
this group.) - exactly what I was hoping for.
S.
On 10 April 2010 4:26 AM, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote
>>> What I am hoping is that somebo
In message , Barry Mar
golin writes:
> In article ,
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > I would be asking operators of primary-dns.co.uk why they are
> > actively cache poisioning. They have not been delegated aaisp.net.uk
> > so they should not be serving aaisp.net.uk.
>
> They could be a stealth sl
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> I would be asking operators of primary-dns.co.uk why they are
> actively cache poisioning. They have not been delegated aaisp.net.uk
> so they should not be serving aaisp.net.uk.
They could be a stealth slave, hidden master, etc. There's no rule that
says th
From: ma...@isc.org [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: 09 April 2010 11:15 PM
To: Doug Barton
Cc: David Forrest; Steven Wilmot; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: CNAME Issue - Whether to use CNAME-data or Response-Flag
>>> I would be asking operators of primary-dns.co.uk why they are
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton
>>> I'll leave it up to the protocol experts to answer your question, but my
followup question is:
>> "what bad thing are you seeing happen because of this?"
A very minor side-effect (but one that I would like to understand the cause
of) is that w
Inline reply below
-Original Message-
From: David Forrest [mailto:d...@maple.maplepark.com]
Sent: 09 April 2010 9:28 PM
To: Doug Barton
Cc: Steven Wilmot; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: CNAME Issue - Whether to use CNAME-data or Response-Flag
>> Doug: I think it is a
See inline replies below
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton [mailto:do...@dougbarton.us]
Sent: 09 April 2010 8:50 PM
To: Steven Wilmot
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: CNAME Issue - Whether to use CNAME-data or Response-Flag
>> When I try to resolve mail.wilmot.me.uk a
See inline replies below...
-Original Message-
From: David Forrest [mailto:d...@maple.maplepark.com]
Sent: 09 April 2010 7:53 PM
To: Steven Wilmot
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: CNAME Issue - Whether to use CNAME-data or Response-Flag
>>>> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, S
In message <4bbf91de.2070...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> On 04/09/10 13:28, David Forrest wrote:
> >
> > Doug: I think it is a server error that is being reported because
> > the status is NXDOMAIN instead of the expected NOERROR.
>
> Well that's all you really had to say. :) I admit
On 04/09/10 13:28, David Forrest wrote:
>
> Doug: I think it is a server error that is being reported because
> the status is NXDOMAIN instead of the expected NOERROR.
Well that's all you really had to say. :) I admit that I didn't catch
the NXDOMAIN bit when I looked at the dig output, I was fo
When I try to resolve mail.wilmot.me.uk against my local resolver (which
happens to be BIND 9.6.2-P1 atm) I get the expected result:
host mail.wilmot.me.uk
mail.wilmot.me.uk is an alias for wilmot.me.uk.mail.aaisp.net.uk.
wilmot.me.uk.mail.aaisp.net.uk has address 81.187.30.19
wilmot.me.uk.mail.aa
I am currently in the middle of trying to troubleshoot a DNS issue that
seems to produce different results when using BIND and Microsoft DNS Servers
(This is also an open support-incident with both my ISP and Microsoft
Support)
What I am hoping is that somebody might be able to help point me i
14 matches
Mail list logo
