Re: Bind 9.16.28 upgrade: high memory utiization and OOM

On 28. 09. 22 13:50, Prasanna Mathivanan (pmathiva) via bind-users wrote: Thanks Ondrej for responding. We have created gitlab issue for the same. Adding it here for reference https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/3568 To close the loop for readers of this list: This particula

Re: Bind 9.16.28 upgrade: high memory utiization and OOM

-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.28 upgrade: high memory utiization and OOM Hi Prasanna, first of all, I would recommend you to conduct all the testing using the latest 9.16.33 release. There is a difference in a memory usage between the versions, but you are not the first person to

Re: Bind 9.16.28 upgrade: high memory utiization and OOM

Hi Prasanna, first of all, I would recommend you to conduct all the testing using the latest 9.16.33 release. There is a difference in a memory usage between the versions, but you are not the first person to report the increased memory usage during the resolver operation. We've been unable to

Bind 9.16.28 upgrade: high memory utiization and OOM

Hi team, We had recently upgraded our bind nameservers from 9.14.10 to 9.16.28. This led to the hosts gradually using up a lot of memory and eventually named was OOM killed as it consumed nearly 7GB out of total 8GB server memory. (This package was built from source for centos 7) I’ve been loo