Re: Bind-9.5.0-P2

2009-06-26 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:55:07 -0400, Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina wrote: > I have Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga) Okay, then if your kernel supports epoll (at least all 2.6 kernels should support it as far as I know), 9.5.1 should work much better for you than 9.5.0-P2.

RE: Bind-9.5.0-P2

2009-06-26 Thread Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina
Tatuya / [mailto:jin...@isc.org] Sent: Jueves, 25 de Junio de 2009 18:27 To: Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Bind-9.5.0-P2 At Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:05:27 -0400, Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina wrote: > Y have a problem with bind, part of f

Re: Bind-9.5.0-P2

2009-06-25 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:05:27 -0400, Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina wrote: > Y have a problem with bind, part of file mesagges is: Please use 9.5.1. 9.5.0-P2 is an emergency security fix version with limitation on performance/scalability. It should still work (or have worked) for most peopl

Bind-9.5.0-P2

2009-06-25 Thread Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina
Hello Y have a problem with bind, part of file mesagges is: Jun 25 12:50:25 amon named[13443]: socket: too many open file descriptors Jun 25 12:50:26 amon last message repeated 112 times Jun 25 12:50:26 amon named[13443]: client 200.72.65.45#40268: recursive-clients soft limit exceeded, aborting

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-12-03 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:31:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are using Solaris SunOS 5.9 with BIND 9.3.2-P2 that is running properly. > When we tried to install the other versions of BIND such BIND 9.5.0-P2 and > BIND 9.4.2-P1, we faced a lot of resolvin

RE: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-12-03 Thread Daniel Dawalibi
Hi We are using Solaris SunOS 5.9 with BIND 9.3.2-P2 that is running properly. When we tried to install the other versions of BIND such BIND 9.5.0-P2 and BIND 9.4.2-P1, we faced a lot of resolving problems with "Server Failed" message. Regards, Daniel -Original Message- Fr

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:29:05 +0200, Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The value of max-cache-size is unlimited. We installed another version of > bind on different servers, but we are still facing the same issue. Please be more specific. Exactly which "another version" did you try? Wh

RE: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Dawalibi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torsten Segner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Have you set the max-cache-size variable to a reasonable value other than the default 32MB? If you can stand to use a version of bind officially list

Re: BIND 9.5.0-P2 DNS issue

2008-11-14 Thread Thomas Schulz
a bug in the cache cleaning and increases the default max-cache-size. As far as I can tell, it is not less stable than 9.5.0-P2. >On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:26:37 +0200 >Daniel Dawalibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> After upgrad