Hello Mark,
Sorry but I was referring to 9.10.0-P1. I've forgotten the last zero.
> On 28/05/2014, at 11:53, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
>
>
> Please, please, please use the FULL version when reporting or
> commenting.
>
> BIND 9.10-P1 does not exist. BIND 9.10 is a feature set of which
> BIND 9.1
Please, please, please use the FULL version when reporting or
commenting.
BIND 9.10-P1 does not exist. BIND 9.10 is a feature set of which
BIND 9.10.0 is the initial release and BIND 9.10.x (x>0) are
maintenance releases or if you want to use Microsoft terminology
Service Packs. BIND 9.10.X-PY
Thanks for the info. I don’t know how I missed the 9.10-p1 update.
_
Nicholas Miller, OIT, University of Colorado at Boulder
On May 28, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Vinícius Ferrão wrote:
> I've had the same crash those days. Just check if you hav
I've had the same crash those days. Just check if you have the latest 9.10
version. I wasn't running 9.10-p1.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 28/05/2014, at 10:30, "Nicholas F Miller"
> wrote:
>
> Not that they are related but we had a crash of bind about seven hours after
> installing 9.10:
>
> n
Not that they are related but we had a crash of bind about seven hours after
installing 9.10:
named[20831]: name.c:534: REQUIREname) != ((void *)0)) && (((const
isc__magic_t *)(name))->magic == ((('D') << 24 | ('N') << 16 | ('S') << 8 |
('n')) failed, back trace
Back to 9.9.5 for now.
Amir,
No, I haven't found any tunings work on BIND 9.10. I filed a bug (ISC-Bugs
#35961) against ISC for them to investigate. By the way, are you running RHEL
as well?
Until the performance issue with 9.10 gets fixed, we will stick with 9.9.x.
On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 9:10 AM, "a...@localhost.m
Shawn,
Same with us here. We tested using bind 9.9.5 the recursive queries can reach
10,000 qps and when using 9.10-P1/9.10 .. we only can burst at 3,000 QPS..
Have you find any solution to share with us?
Thanks
amir
On Saturday, May 3, 2014 4:42:30 AM UTC+8, Shawn Zhou wrote:
> I was hopin
I was hoping that BIND 9.10 would outperform BIND 9.9.4b1 on RHEL 6.5 but I was
surprised to see so much performance drop from BIND 9.10.
We have been able to send test traffic with 180K qps against 9.9.4b1 without
seeing query drops but with 9.10, the query drop rate was 18%. Both of the
num
8 matches
Mail list logo
