Re: BIND roadmap

2013-02-28 Thread WBrown
Doug wrote on 02/28/2013 12:31:21 PM: > You probably want to have some discussions with OS vendors that embed > BIND to familiarize yourself with how many people are using ESV versions > from that channel. Or even older versions. FWIW, Ubuntu 8.04LTS uses bind 9.4.2. They backport critical f

Re: BIND roadmap

2013-02-28 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/28/2013 02:37 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: Note though that as far as I can tell, few people actually use the ESV software. Please let us know if the ESV policy works for you! You probably want to have some discussions with OS vendors that embed BIND to familiarize yourself with how many people

Re: BIND roadmap

2013-02-28 Thread WBrown
Shane Kerr wrote on 02/28/2013 05:37:26 AM: > On Thursday, 2013-02-28 11:19:01 +1100, > Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > ISC has no specific plans to end BIND 9 development. As Mark correctly > says: Thanks for the clarification. > > BIND 10 is still a way off being a replacement for BIND 9. >

Re: BIND roadmap

2013-02-28 Thread Shane Kerr
William, On Thursday, 2013-02-28 11:19:01 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message > , > wbr...@e1b.org writes: > > Congrats to ISC and everyone that has worked on BIND 10! > > > > I am building new name servers and redesigning our infrastructure > > with an eye towards streamlining, improvin

Re: BIND roadmap

2013-02-27 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , wbr...@e1b.org writes: > Congrats to ISC and everyone that has worked on BIND 10! > > I am building new name servers and redesigning our infrastructure with an > eye towards streamlining, improving security and implementing DNSSEC. I > had been testing a few things with BIND 9.9.

BIND roadmap

2013-02-27 Thread WBrown
Congrats to ISC and everyone that has worked on BIND 10! I am building new name servers and redesigning our infrastructure with an eye towards streamlining, improving security and implementing DNSSEC. I had been testing a few things with BIND 9.9.x. Now that BIND 10 is released, I am wonderin