Re: BIND and listening on interfaces

2014-08-01 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <53dba84d.8030...@thelounge.net>, Reindl Harald writes: > > the thread yesterday reminded me on my Fedora bugrpeort > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1073038#c3 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1073038#c8 > > i don't buy "Note that destination IP address m

Re: BIND and listening on interfaces

2014-08-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.08.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Phil Mayers: > Binding separate sockets per IP is IMO just as reliable, and is well tested. > If you > weren't so opposed to "rndc", you could just call "rndc reconfig" in whatever > network system/dispatch tool you have after IPs - or wait for bind 9.10. it's not

Re: BIND and listening on interfaces

2014-08-01 Thread Sam Wilson
In article , Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 01.08.2014 um 17:16 schrieb Barry Margolin: > > In article , > > Reindl Harald wrote: > > > >> the thread yesterday reminded me on my Fedora bugrpeort > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073038#c3 > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c

Re: BIND and listening on interfaces

2014-08-01 Thread Phil Mayers
On 01/08/14 15:46, Reindl Harald wrote: if listen-on {0.0.0.0;}; would work a lot of problems could go away - keep in mind that on modern systemd systems a service can bind to 0.0.0.0 even before the network is started Most people just use "rndc reconfig". In bind 9.10 the routing socket, on

Re: BIND and listening on interfaces

2014-08-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.08.2014 um 17:16 schrieb Barry Margolin: > In article , > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> the thread yesterday reminded me on my Fedora bugrpeort >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073038#c3 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073038#c8 >> >> i don't buy "Note that des

Re: BIND and listening on interfaces

2014-08-01 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Reindl Harald wrote: > the thread yesterday reminded me on my Fedora bugrpeort > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073038#c3 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073038#c8 > > i don't buy "Note that destination IP address must be > known and set correctly in re

BIND and listening on interfaces

2014-08-01 Thread Reindl Harald
the thread yesterday reminded me on my Fedora bugrpeort https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073038#c3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073038#c8 i don't buy "Note that destination IP address must be known and set correctly in reply, otherwise clients will be confused" because