On 02/11/12 2:08, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
> On 11/1/2012 3:31 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
>> The typical server setup (for own servers) is that one name is used for
>> setting up e.g. the mail server, the ideal situation for everybody is
>> that whether I am in house or visiting you, if I have any int
On 11/1/2012 3:31 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
The typical server setup (for own servers) is that one name is used for
setting up e.g. the mail server, the ideal situation for everybody is
that whether I am in house or visiting you, if I have any internet
access, I can read and send mail.
Now if the
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Alan Clegg wrote:
>
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
>> I recommend using "auto-dnssec maintain" so named keeps the zone signed,
>> instead of dnssec-signzone.
>
> I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this
> document.
On 01/11/12 12:26, Alan Clegg wrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Kobus Bensch wrote:
Is that because split horizon doubles admin or because its bad all together?
I have been using split horizon for many years now and found it very useful.
Any thoughts from any on the list would be most welc
On Nov 1 2012, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of
this document.
I believe you've mentioned that here before. Several times. Today. ;-)
"What I tell you three times is true.”
The Bellman, pp Lewis Carroll
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@ca
> I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this
> document.
I believe you've mentioned that here before. Several times. Today. ;-)
-JP
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
fr
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> I recommend using "auto-dnssec maintain" so named keeps the zone signed,
> instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this document.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | a...@clegg.com
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> I recommend using "auto-dnssec maintain" so named keeps the zone signed,
> instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this document.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | a...@clegg.com
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> I recommend using "auto-dnssec maintain" so named keeps the zone signed,
> instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this document.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | a...@clegg.com
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> I recommend using "auto-dnssec maintain" so named keeps the zone signed,
> instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this document.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | a...@clegg.com
__
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> I recommend using "auto-dnssec maintain" so named keeps the zone signed,
> instead of dnssec-signzone.
I do as well, and this will be documented in the next version of this document.
AlanC
--
Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | a...@clegg.com
__
;Alan Clegg"
To: "Kobus Bensch"
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Thursday, 1 November, 2012 11:26:31 AM
Subject: Re: BIND and DNSSEC
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Kobus Bensch wrote:
> Is that because split horizon doubles admin or because its bad all together?
>
> I have
Feng He wrote:
>
> Take a look at:
> http://www.dnssec.lk/docs/DNSSEC_in_6_minutes.pdf
I recommend using "auto-dnssec maintain" so named keeps the zone signed,
instead of dnssec-signzone.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasion
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Kobus Bensch wrote:
> Is that because split horizon doubles admin or because its bad all together?
>
> I have been using split horizon for many years now and found it very useful.
> Any thoughts from any on the list would be most welcomed.
Crafted for a private rep
bus Bensch"
Cc: "Feng He" , bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Thursday, 1 November, 2012 11:08:10 AM
Subject: Re: BIND and DNSSEC
On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Kobus Bensch wrote:
> Thank you for this. Had a look and it seems fairly easy. Not sure if that is
> a flippant remark.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Kobus Bensch wrote:
> Thank you for this. Had a look and it seems fairly easy. Not sure if that is
> a flippant remark.
As the author of this document, I must say thanks. Deploying DNSSEC is not
hard.
It's the care and feeding after-the-fact (key rollover) that y
Thank you for this. Had a look and it seems fairly easy. Not sure if that is a
flippant remark.
A question: is implementing dnssec a good enough reason to abandon split
horizon DNS?
Kobus
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Nov 2012, at 02:01, Feng He wrote:
> 于 2012-10-31 23:05, Kobus Bensch 写道:
>
? 2012-10-31 23:05, Kobus Bensch ??:
Can anybody point me in the direction of a good guide on setting up
BIND split horizon DNS and DNSSEC?
Take a look at:
http://www.dnssec.lk/docs/DNSSEC_in_6_minutes.pdf
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailma
Hi
Can anybody point me in the direction of a good guide on setting up BIND split
horizon DNS and DNSSEC?
Thanks in advance
Kobus
--
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users
19 matches
Mail list logo
