On 5/17/16 11:08 PM, Michael McNally wrote:
> Though this flaw can occur with any compiler, it's substantially more
> likely to lead to a crash when BIND is compiled on the x86_64 platform
> using the 'clang' compiler and a difference in the node structure between
> BIND 9.9 and 9.10 makes the fai
To our users:
Last week, reacting to reports from several users concerning assertion
failures in BIND 9.10.4, we took the unusual step of deprecating that
release while we investigated the problem: internal checks detecting a
state in the cache data structure that should have been impossible.
Tha
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 07:45:41AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Known issue triggering a number of insist failures in rbt.c.
> Please roll back to 9.10.3-P4 while we prepare a new release.
Note that the probable fix is already in our public git repository.
https://source.isc.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cg
Known issue triggering a number of insist failures in rbt.c.
Please roll back to 9.10.3-P4 while we prepare a new release.
In message <573b903f.9000...@electricembers.coop>, Benjamin Connelly writes:
> We are seeing occasional crashes after updating to 9.10.4 on FreeBSD 10.1.
>
>
> May 17 09:46
We are seeing occasional crashes after updating to 9.10.4 on FreeBSD 10.1.
May 17 09:46:07 smtp1 named[74136]: general: critical: rbt.c:2576:
INSIST(delete)->is_root == 1) ? isc_boolean_true :
isc_boolean_false) && *rootp == delete) || (! (((delete)->is_root == 1)
? isc_boolean_true : isc
Hello,
On 12 May 2016, at 15:44, Peter van Dijk wrote:
I’ve heard two proposals:
(1) brew fakes up a version number X that sorts 9.10.4 < X < Y, where
Y is whatever ISC is going to release next
(2) ISC ‘clones’ 9.10.3-P4 into 9.10.5 (or 9.10.4-P1 but that
seems wrong) so the highest version in
Hello Michael,
On 11 May 2016, at 10:49, Michael McNally wrote:
To our users:
Recently, on Thursday 28 April, ISC released two maintenance releases
of BIND 9:
- BIND 9.9.9
- BIND 9.10.4
Beginning after the release of BIND 9.10.4 we started receiving a
small number of reports from recursive
To our users:
Recently, on Thursday 28 April, ISC released two maintenance releases
of BIND 9:
- BIND 9.9.9
- BIND 9.10.4
Beginning after the release of BIND 9.10.4 we started receiving a
small number of reports from recursive server operators who have
encountered an INSIST assertion in code w
8 matches
Mail list logo
