RE: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-17 Thread Tony Finch
Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote: > My understanding is that the "extra" stuff wouldn't have any signature > at all. I'm not sure if the question was that well specified :-) > Wouldn't that break DNSSEC if the rest of the response had signatures? > Or does the DNSSEC-validation algorithm support "hybrid

Re: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 15.06.16 18:43, Jun Xiang X Tee wrote: When I query for "google.com", the additional section returned is: ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns1.google.com. 200487 IN A 216.239.32.10 ns2.google.com. 197774 IN A 216.239.34.10 ns3.google.com. 246981 I

RE: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-16 Thread Darcy Kevin (FCA)
brid" responses like that? - Kevin -Original Message- From: Tony Finch [mailto:d...@dotat.at] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 7:09 AM To: Darcy Kevin (FCA) Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

RE: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-16 Thread Tony Finch
Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote: > > It'll also, irrespective of caching, break DNSSEC. No, extra stuff in the additional section should not break DNSSEC because the signatures are per-RRset not per-message. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Tyne, West Dogger: Varia

Re: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-15 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Jun Xiang X Tee wrote: ... I wish to append a hard-coded text tuple into end of the section. ... I think what you want to do sounds strange, but if I wanted to do something like that I would not modify an existing perfectly good utility. I would create a new o

Re: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-15 Thread Jun Xiang X Tee
Tee From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Darcy Kevin (FCA) Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:05:08 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature That's not re

RE: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-15 Thread Darcy Kevin (FCA)
.@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jun Xiang X Tee Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 2:43 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature Dear members, This is my first time posting a question to the mailing list. I am not sure whether

Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-15 Thread Jun Xiang X Tee
Dear members, This is my first time posting a question to the mailing list. I am not sure whether I should post my technical question to this list or not. If it is not, I apologize for any inconvenience caused. When I query for "google.com", the additional section returned is: ;; ADD