Re: Allowing resolution of off-server CNAMEs

2011-07-13 Thread Joseph S D Yao
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:26:16AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote: > On Jul 8, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Joseph S D Yao wrote: > > I'd rather that recursion controls only control recursion. > > And not forwarding - have separate forwarding controls, says I. > > Forwarding is a response to a recursive query. Fo

Re: Allowing resolution of off-server CNAMEs

2011-07-11 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 7/8/2011 12:11 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote: It should be possible to set up an authoritative-only name server so that it does not recurse for anyone [except perhaps itself], but still allow someone to get a full resolution of a name whose canonical name is elsewhere. IMHBUCO. I started with thi

Re: Allowing resolution of off-server CNAMEs

2011-07-09 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/08/2011 05:11 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote: It should be possible to set up an authoritative-only name server so that it does not recurse for anyone [except perhaps itself], but still allow someone to get a full resolution of a name whose canonical name is elsewhere. IMHBUCO. Why? The recu

Re: Allowing resolution of off-server CNAMEs

2011-07-08 Thread Chris Buxton
On Jul 8, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Joseph S D Yao wrote: > I'd rather that recursion controls only control recursion. > And not forwarding - have separate forwarding controls, says I. Forwarding is a response to a recursive query. For an iterative query, even if you have recursion enabled, the server wo

Allowing resolution of off-server CNAMEs

2011-07-08 Thread Joseph S D Yao
It should be possible to set up an authoritative-only name server so that it does not recurse for anyone [except perhaps itself], but still allow someone to get a full resolution of a name whose canonical name is elsewhere. IMHBUCO. I started with this: view all { match-clients { any; }