If the A records are owned by the target of a CNAME, or by the names
referred to by NS records in the Authority Section, then they're related
to the query being made and therefore not really "unsolicited".
To repeat: BIND doesn't have a way to include unrelated/unsolicited A
records in a respo
I do see additional "unsolicited" A-records being returned with CNAME-records
and NS-records. They seem to be honored by the forwarders and resolvers on the
way back.
In addition i should have mentioned that these records will be hosts in the
same domain and this is implemented for a authoritat
On 4/18/2010 5:17 AM, Fabian Hahn wrote:
To speed up queries for the user I need to force the inclusion of additional
records in a DNS response.
I.e. when returning www.domain.com A I would like to force the inclusion of
A-records for static1.domain.com and static2.domain.com since they wi
In article ,
Fabian Hahn wrote:
> To speed up queries for the user I need to force the inclusion of additional
> records in a DNS response.
>
> I.e. when returning www.domain.com A I would like to force the inclusion
> of A-records for static1.domain.com and static2.domain.com since they
To speed up queries for the user I need to force the inclusion of additional
records in a DNS response.
I.e. when returning www.domain.com A I would like to force the inclusion of
A-records for static1.domain.com and static2.domain.com since they will be used
in the same web-page.
Thanks
5 matches
Mail list logo
