Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Techs_Maru
Hi, Thanks to me to politely reply. 2014-12-17 15:16 GMT+09:00 Evan Hunt : > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 01:30:35PM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: >> However, >> if the value of the default "7" would be the value that was created >> based on the world data ? >> ( Also for the default value of "max-recursion

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 05:20:09PM -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: > But each CNAME is in a different domain, and their nameservers were in > yet other domains. So while resolving the CNAME chain, you also have to > perform several levels of recursion. > > Does the max-recursion-depth limit apply to

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Evan Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:32:30AM -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: > > Didn't someone post a problem they were having a few days ago because of > > a chain of Akamai CNAMEs that exceeded the limit? > > Recursion depth is about how many layers deep you have to go to

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:32:30AM -0500, Barry Margolin wrote: > Didn't someone post a problem they were having a few days ago because of > a chain of Akamai CNAMEs that exceeded the limit? Recursion depth is about how many layers deep you have to go to resolve an NS address. CNAME chains have

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Evan Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 01:30:35PM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: > > However, > > if the value of the default "7" would be the value that was created > > based on the world data ? > > ( Also for the default value of "max-recursion-queries 50;" ) > > I haven't personal

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-16 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 01:30:35PM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: > However, > if the value of the default "7" would be the value that was created > based on the world data ? > ( Also for the default value of "max-recursion-queries 50;" ) I haven't personally seen any real world queries go more than 4 l

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-16 Thread Techs_Maru
Hi,Evan, Thank you for replying. I was able to understand, try setting to test servers. Thanks. However, if the value of the default "7" would be the value that was created based on the world data ? ( Also for the default value of "max-recursion-queries 50;" ) I want to know the recommended set

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-15 Thread Evan Hunt
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:13:17AM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: > But, "max-recursion-depth", > However, it tried but it did not become a Servfail. > Meaning of is is "Indirections" is described in the document, it means > that when the authority server that does not come directly returns the > IP addr

[question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-15 Thread Techs_Maru
Hi, Bind-user folks, I have a question, about Vulnerability CVE-2014-8500 new bind option "max-recursion-depth", I do not know this option meaning. I read ARM Documents I used Bind Version is 9.9.6-P1. -- max-recursion-depth Sets the maximum number of levels of re