I have a resolver that is not resolving several domains. So far what I
found in logs is this message, repeated several times in the span of every
minute
*nssv named[38251]: resolver priming query complete: failure*
I'm using BIND 9.18.28
This is current config
# named-checkconf -p
options {
dire
Hello
This days i got a strange behavior in my network/bind server.
Each 20/30 minutes and lasting about 5 minutes i got 'timeout' in bind
querys. After that time everything works fine again.
My bind server got response (from 0.1 to 2 seconds) but reply with a ICMP
'port unreachable'.
Any idea
Hi all,
I had a bind 9.16.4 as recursive name server. I want to forward all queries
to a specific dns server out of my net such as 8.8.8.8. While I have a new
domain( such as abc.com) I want to forward to a new dns server such as
9.9.9.9.
Here is my named.conf:
options {
listen-on port
Dear I've implemented two views, one for local resolution and the other for
forward a public zone to our resolver.
But now I have a problem:
If I define the same clients for the local zone view and forward view,
depending on the order of the views the client can resolve or not the
query. In this
Hi all,
I'm runnig some analisys on my BIND instances, I'm interested in find out
how much time it takes every single query, but I' can't find and option to
show this information in the log
The dns is used by our customers and they ask for detailed reports (
they'll never read ... :)
It would be a
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Hello,
I've got a raspberry pi with 5 network interfaces (3 WLAN and
two wired LAN).
Also, I have set up a BIND 9 server. Now I want to give the PI (the
hostname is "DEV") a different IP address for every single interface.
For example: when a client from the network 192.168.2.0/24 lo
> From: Phil Mayers
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org,
> Date: 05/02/2013 15:26
> Subject: Re: Selective resolution in a corporate environment
>
> On 05/02/13 15:16, funky monkey wrote:
>
> > But to get back to what I'm often asked for, more as a tactical
> > solution, is there any way of being abl
In message <20121130125333.gc9...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 29.11.12 18:34, Jose Manuel Delgado G. wrote:
> >about the other question, as to reduce the response time of my server when
> >the domain does not exist?
>
> it is not the "domain does not exist" problem. This is
I'd like to install on Ubuntu 12.04 a DNS server using BIND9.
As a first step, I'd just like to configure it as a forwarder for my box
only.
This is what I do:
1. I deactivate `dnsmasq` editing
`/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf` by commenting the `dns=dnsmasq`
line.
Before, the `/etc/resol
Dear all,
I have the following situation in my zone migration for one server (A) to
another server (B)
The zone is called toto.be and contains the following record:
www.toto.be 86400 IN CNAME www.titi.be
==> the zone titi.be is in the same server (A) but is not transferred to the
server (
In message , hugo hugoo writes:
>
> Doug
>
> The problem is that the parent zone and the subzone are on the same name se=
> rver.
>
> If I do a dig @name_server subzone NS or dig @name_server zone NS ... =
> I receive the same NS answer.
Hugo, you asked this before and you got a number o
Dear all,
I have a problem in the understanding of the creation of a subzone.
Here the situation; let's call the name server ns1.xxx.be
I have zone "toto.be" with some records (not important)
In the same name server, I want to create the subzone "titi.toto.be" with some
records.
==> d
Hello, list!
I have split view on my name-servers (master and slave), for internal
and external clients i have zone with similar names, but different content.
Part of config named.conf on master:
view "internal" {
match-clients { myclients; };
recursion yes;
match-recursive-only yes
Hello All,
We have our slave servers running compiled Bind 9.6.1-P3 on CentOS 5.4.
Can I upgrade to 9.8.1-P1 directly from the current version 9.6.1-P3? Or It
has to be on the same 9.6.ESV-R5-P1 latest version?
Master is in internal running on Bind 9.2.1, doing only pusing the
config/zon
Hello,
I'm seeing an unfamiliar error while attempting to start a newly built from
source named instance. I've search on the net and within the bind-user list
without luck, DST returns lots of hits, but nothing with "named DST".
hoping someone here might know what its about. Is it real
Chris Thompson writes:
> Nothing that I can see. Maybe dnsviz can't cope with multiple PTR
> records in an RRset, as your first case has? (On the other hand it
> handles multiple A records in forward zones OK.)
to be fair, multiple PTR RRs is something we added in BIND gethostbyaddr()
in more or
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 063F2638001.AC137
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Au
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: A075B638001.ABE87
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Au
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 57AA9638001.AE218
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Au
20 matches
Mail list logo
