Kevin Darcy wrote:
>
> The "master" nomenclature is appropriate from a *data*dependency*
> standpoint. The "master" holds the "master copy" of the zone contents (
> https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/master-copy). All
> other copies are duplicates of that.
There isn't in gene
Monday, June 15, 2020 1:33 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
On 6/15/20 1:15 PM, Michael De Roover wrote:
> Of course I could, but I do not feel like the effort to change nomenclature
> is either beneficial or worth taking for granted the requests of some people
> on Twitter - as the slave to peer authority I am - given how much it affects
> documentation
[ Classification Level: PUBLIC ]
My 2 cents...
The "master" nomenclature is appropriate from a *data*dependency*
standpoint. The "master" holds the "master copy" of the zone contents (
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/master-copy). All
other copies are duplicates of that.
Of course I could, but I do not feel like the effort to change
nomenclature is either beneficial or worth taking for granted the
requests of some people on Twitter - as the slave to peer authority I am
- given how much it affects documentation, code, comments, general
environment of the project
ou always
> got."
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users On Behalf Of Michael
> De Roover
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 1:32 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves
>
> All active links contained in this
l.smil.mil
"If you always do what you always did you will always get what you always got."
-Original Message-
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Michael De
Roover
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 1:32 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slav
7 matches
Mail list logo
