Thanks for the quick response.
Is it possible to rate limit the number of packets per second to allow for
a specific iptables rule especially of *UDP*? If yes, our partial
requirement will be sufficed.
Only difficulty I can think at the moment of using this rule is, the peers
will not be indi
Hi all,
We have a query related to the Bind9 load sharing mechanism across multiple
LDAP connections.
The set-up and configuration details are as below.
- 1 DNS Simulator using dnsperf package
- 1 Bind9 server(version 9.9.4) in RHEL 7.2 and DLZ LDAP plugin enabled
during compilation. This server h
zone "zone1" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/zone1.db";
};
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
From: Sten Carlsen [mailto:st...@s-carlsen.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:37 PM
To: RAM MOHAN, Hari Ganesh
Cc: m...@fuckaroun
file "/etc/bind/zones/zone1.db";
};
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Pol
Hallen
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:21 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: view
We are using BIND 9.9.1-P2 version.
[dns@ncldl38036 ~]$ named -v
BIND 9.9.1-P2
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of S Carr
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 5:13 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc
testq03.fr. 1800IN A 10.224.8.221
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
mi-testq03.fr. 1800IN NS hdqdns.marriott.com.
mi-testq03.fr. 1800IN NS mcncdns.marriott.com.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
hdqdns.marriott.com.1800IN A
: view hdq: transfer of 'mi-testq03.pt/IN': AXFR-style IXFR ended
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of S Carr
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 2:30 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subjec
R: 162.130.128.167#53(162.130.128.167)
;; WHEN: Fri Aug 5 14:21:00 2016
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 89
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of S Carr
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:29 PM
To: bind-users@lists.
Hi There,
We have two DNS views (HDQ and softlayer), Softlayer DNS view is configured
with forwarder as loopback. This is working for all zones except few zones (Ex.
Mi-testq03.pt)
named.conf file,
view "softlayer" {
match-clients { "softlayer"; "softlayer-slaves"; "lnxd0006" };
forward only
hi ,
i want to know what's the differences between bind 9 version (especially
between 9.4 and 9.5/6/7) ,
where can i find a table that can describe it?
i tried to google it but i didn't anything useful , .
can someone assist me here?
thanks in adva
using ulimit -n - 1024 .
where the number 4096 come from?
BTW
the named i'm running using 7 cpus (-n 7 when start).
please advice ,
--
Ram
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:39 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 04:01:31PM +0530,
> ram wrote
> a message of 10 lines which said:
>
> > Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
>
> Technically, yes. It is a very bad idea, but
Is it possible to have a A record for *.domain.com
I know *.domain records works for MX records , not sure wether they work
for A records
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
the error.
thanks,
--
Ram,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , Ram
> Ak
> uka writes:
>> Hi,
>> my system is Debian Etch 32Bit running kernel version 2.6.18
>> uname -a
>> Linux 2.6.18-6-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 17 21:31:27
lem i will be more
then happy to assist here.
thanks in advance,
Ram
2009/8/31 JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 :
> At Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:01:08 +0300,
> Ram Akuka wrote:
>
>> recently i upgraded my DNS to 9.4.3P3 (from 9.4.3).
>> since then i can see the below error more often:
>>
er downgrade to 9.4.2P2?
Thanks,
BTW
i compiled the bind from stretch using only the –enable-threads .
thanks in advance ,
Ram
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
2009/3/25 Alan Clegg :
> Ram Akuka wrote:
>
>> Is there's any way I can encrypt the zone transfer date (without using
>> any third-party encryption tool)?
>
> Why exactly do you want to do this?
>
> DNS data is NOT PROTECTED DATA.
>
> As long as queries
Alan,
Is there's any way I can encrypt the zone transfer date (without using
any third-party encryption tool)?
Thanks,
--
Ram
2009/3/25 Alan Clegg :
> Ram Akuka wrote:
>> but encrypting the file system won't do the work here.
>> i agree that storing the key and the e
at
diffent then clear text ?
Thanks
--
Ram
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Chris Dew wrote:
> You could use the ecrypt fs for the location of the zone data - it
> would require a passphrase when bind starts up on the slave - this
> could cause trouble if the slave crashes.
>
> In gen
,
--
Ram
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
This is slightly OT, I am not able to resolve some domains from a server
hosted at thePlanet (Centos-5.2 with bind 9.3.3 )
-
[r...@smtpout1 ~]# dig @localhost bsnl.in
; <<>> DiG 9.3.3rc2 <<>> @localhost bsnl.in
; (1 server found)
;; global optio
http://www.openspf.org/
They have a wizard you could use for SPF
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 20:45 -0600, Jeff Justice wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a good tutorial/explanation (preferably in
> newbie language of course) of how an SPF record works and how to
> create a correct one?
>
> Jeff J.
22 matches
Mail list logo
