Re: spf ent txt records.

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013, at 03:19 AM, Noel Butler wrote: > > > Vernon Schryver writes: > > > > > to laziness, DNS is not rocket science, I'm sure given ARM and > > access to > > > > google, a 13yo kid could get at least the "basics" right. > > > > > > Laziness?--nonsense. Postel's Law and simple l

Re: Need to improve named performance

Sorry for arriving late and making points that might go without saying but... On Mon, Nov 12, 2012, at 05:23 PM, Ed LaFrance wrote: > Hello Alan - > > Of course you are right, my bad. > > Here's the entirety of my named.conf - there's nothing pertaining to > logging in here, so I guess that mea

Re: lists.isc.org rDNS failed, DNSSEC?

us to avoid using reverse-dns then perhaps that could be beneficial to many. nudge On Wed, Feb 29, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message , michoski writes: > > > Doing DNSSEC verification in 2012 is lopsided the other way. You > > > cannot resolve the nam