Thanks for the ideas!
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 5:15 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
>
> >On 16/11/2024 04:47, Charles Eckman via bind-users wrote:
> >>I'm also down for other workarounds, if you have suggestions!
>
> On 16.11.24 10:40, Nick Tait via bind-users wro
ff in /var will save me some confusion the next time I
have to debug something.
I'm also down for other workarounds, if you have suggestions!
Thanks,
Charles
[1]: https://lists.isc.org/mailman/htdig/bind-users/2020-September/103706.html
[2]: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/c
ing useful?
It might help to describe your load balancer setup: make/model,
software revision level, how you set up the health checks, how
the load balancers failover is configured. Has this behavior
started recently? Have there been any load balancer configuration
changes?
Best regards,
--
Charle
Tony,
Thank you for your detailed and thoughtfuly analysis. I think you are spot-on.
I'm looking into the app that is sending those updates. And wahoo, I won a
prize! That's awesome.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Finch
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 4:23 PM
To: Hellige, Cha
ailed: not authoritative for update zone (NOTAUTH)
11-Mar-2022 10:07:19.821 update: info: grn-mid: view GRN: updating zone
'ops.company.com/IN': adding an RR at 'test-09.ops.company.com' A 1.1.1.9
Any hints on what I might be doing wrong would be greatly appreciated.
~Charles
unemployed soldiers to roam the highways and byways looking
for people to rob and damsels to distress. We need something like knighthood,
the first state police.
Charles Elliott
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ondrej
Surý
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 3:30 PM
To
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 12:25:11PM -0400, Alan Clegg wrote:
> On 10/20/2019 2:09 AM, MEjaz wrote:
>
> > As you know these days there has been several security threats, So
> > deciding to go with *Efficient iP DDI and DNS Security Solution*
> > https://www.efficientip.com/
>
> You may want to a
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 07:46:20PM +0300, Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users
wrote:
> On 26/6/2019 17:39, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
> > Or are you wanting to update the zone contents without actually updating
> > the zone file on disk?
>
> Yes, exactly this. That is the reason I changed
o design a user
interface for an ideal domain name system?
Day in and day out the vast majority of
messages that appear on this bind list server
are about configuration issues. Isn't it
time to get a new perspective on solving
these problems?
Charles Elliott
-Original Message-
From:
in time, save it somewhere, restart query processing, and then format
the report from the saved data. In this case, there would be a brief
interval when name could not handle queries. One might have to write a
prototype to determine how long that interruption would take.
Charles Elliott
If you search for the terms "Computer location," "Default computer
location," "Sensor data API," you may find:
Hundreds of people have complained about this issue.
None of the proposed solutions work.
In Windows 7 it was possible to enter your location as your exact postal
address, but MSFT has
WorksForMe info.nominet.uk = 137.117.185.220 both thru my ISP (75.75.75.75)
and through Bind at 07:50 AM EST (USA, GMT - 5:00). Maybe it is fixed on
the domain name server.
Charles Elliott
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Volker
SITY) library to see if any of it worked in PostgreSQL 8.4.
Charles Elliott
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Job
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 10:02 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Postgresql 8.4 optimize heavy load
He
Hi--
On Mar 22, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
[ ... ]
> I appreciate the announcement of the change ahead of time, but I don't feel
> like it is safe to update my root hints file based on an email, which could
> be spoofed. It's not that I don't trust you, but someone could spoof your
>
On Feb 5, 2016, at 6:09 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> Why point them to an IP at all, just use TTL and SOA , no A no nothing else.
>
> They'll get NXDOMAIN when trying to look it up, problem solved.
One might point such domains to a local webserver which has been configured
to reply to all image req
On Aug 7, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> I’m pretty new to BIND, and am tasked with monitoring several BIND server. A
> script is in place that runs hourly, via cron, looking for any anomalies in
> named.log. Here’s the essence of the script:
>
> grep -i -E ':
On Aug 6, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Heiko Richter wrote:
> Whenever I post something to the list (I'm not using SMTP, I'm using a
> usenet server to post to comp.protocols.dns.bind), my postmaster
> address receives DMARC notifications from list members that have
> employed this wonderful protocol on thei
On Jul 13, 2015, at 10:34 AM, Lucio Crusca wrote:
[ ... ]
> Yes the zone failed to update, I know because if I raise the seqno @ns1, it
> tries to update and it keeps failing. I don't understand why it fails. I
> doubt a Cisco router is to blame here because ns1 and ns2 are two guests of
> the
>
> Adjust serial-query-rate. This also controls the notify rate in BIND 9.9.
> A seperate control "notify-rate" is coming in BIND 9.11.
>
Today we tried increasing serial-query-rate from our original value of 1000 up
to 5000 for a while, and then up to 1. The symptoms (long delay for NOTIF
We are experiencing a delay of approximately 9 minutes between the time a zone
is changed on our DNS master (via nsupdate) and the time at which the NOTIFY is
sent to slaves. We've turned up logging on the master and some slaves, then
watched for messages regarding a test zone. On the master, an
Hi, Mathew--
On May 21, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Mathew Ian Eis wrote:
> Hi BIND,
>
> I’ve been trying to track down the source of random latency in our production
> servers, without much luck. At random intervals - several times an hour -
> named appears to suddenly stop processing queries for aroun
Hi--
On Dec 9, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
> Wanted to point out that (perhaps sadly) this isn't so crazypants...or at
> least not uncommon. The *edge* and *aka* references speak Akamai DNS+CDN.
> From my last overview, this has gotten cleaner in the latest versions of
> th
Hi--
On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Bill Christensen
wrote:
> Fair enough.
>
> Africabound.org
> SustainableSources.com
>
> The server that's giving problems is ns1.sustainablesources.com
> 205.238.182.102
Your 102 box doesn't seem responding to 53/udp or 53/tcp from the outside:
http://w
Hi--
On Aug 19, 2014, at 1:47 PM, "Adamiec, Lawrence"
wrote:
> I am running BIND 9.6-ESV-R5-P1 on a Solaris 10 server. I can run queries
> without specifying a name server on my Solaris servers successfully. When I
> try to run a query on a Solaris 10 virtual server, I get "connection timed
Hi--
On Jan 20, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> I have a full /24, which I would like to separate into two /25's, and
> assign each half to two of my customers. The snag is that *I* maintain
> the DNS for each of these customers.
>
> Is it possible to create the classless setup within m
Hi—
On Oct 28, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> Slave X.internal.example.com
+1; it’s also worth looking into why there is such a high volume
of DNS queries. Is it simply a big network with a lot of chatty
clients? Or is TTL turned down so low that client side caching
is not effective and
Hi--
On Oct 2, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Balanagaraju Munukutla <9ba...@sg.ibm.com> wrote:
> Any one could help on the error below.
>
> [andrew@oc8163211842 ~] $ dig @.com abcd.com.sg mx
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 <<>> @x.com abcd.com.sg mx
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global
Hi--
On Sep 25, 2013, at 12:22 PM, IT Support wrote:
> Hi charles
I'm "Chuck", although I've also answered to worse things than my full name. :-)
> this is what i get from dig
>
> dig host2.mydomain.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4 <<
On Jul 18, 2013, at 1:18 PM, John Miller wrote:
> I know that for the following record in example.com's zone file:
>
> host.example.com. IN CNAME otherhost
>
> BIND will return:
>
> host.example.com. IN CNAME otherhost.example.com.
Assuming $ORIGIN is set to example.com, but yes.
> Is this
On Jun 28, 2013, at 10:54 AM, "Ward, Mike S" wrote:
> Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for a zone?
Certainly. Various software performs what's called a double-reverse lookup
to confirm that the A and PTR records match.
> I have asked some of the admins here and th
@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: long SPF txt record
On 6/20/2013 1:13 PM, Koehler, Charles wrote:
> Our email group wants to change the current SPF txt record and replace it
> with one that is 274 characters.
>
> How can I put it in so that it works correctly?
>
> Thanks
> --cwk
Our email group wants to change the current SPF txt record and replace it with
one that is 274 characters.
How can I put it in so that it works correctly?
Thanks
--cwk
==
Charles Koehler
Network Operations - IT Infrastructure
UCSF
500 Parnassus Ave P7-14
San
On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Norman Fournier wrote:
> [ ... ]
> (...Members of the httpd-users list says the same thing - its not an httpd
> problem.
>From what you've said below, they're quite right.
> I am just trying to take possibilities off my list of potential errors, sorry
> if I am ann
On Jun 17, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Norman Fournier wrote:
> I am working on bringing a virtual webserver behind a router online and am
> encountering problems.
OK. The odds are very good that you should ask about this on an
Apache/nginx/etc forum, as it's unlikely to be related to DNS or BIND.
> In
On Jun 11, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Gary Wallis wrote:
> DNS experts:
>
> What really happens in the real world when 1 out of three authoritative NSs
> are down for 30 minutes due to a datacenter outage?
Properly functioning nameservers will note that queries sent to the NS which is
down aren't getti
May 2010
Thx
Charles
Greetings list..
I have recently assumed responsibility and did a
complete rebuild of a Master DNS server running 9.6.1.P3. (will
upgrade to 9.6.2 when SRPM is available)
OS: CentOS 5.4
New to DNS administration but not new to Linux / UNIX..
I am looking at dnssec-tools for
to address .127)
Can anyone help out with the proper format of the zone and what a PTR record
would look like?
Thanks a LOT!
Charles Lee
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
37 matches
Mail list logo
