Bind 9.8 with DNSSEC and Thales nShield HSM

2011-03-18 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I conducted a DNSSEC tests with Bind 9.8 (also 9.7.3) and Thales nShield HSM. Everything compiled fine, I was able to generate keys and list keys on HSM: # pkcs11-list -p xxx object[0]: handle 1120 class 3 label[6] 'example-KSK' id[0] object[1]: han

Re: DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-25 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 2011-01-24 17:47, Kalman Feher pisze: > This appears to be the problem. > I copied your NSEC3PARAM (opt out clear, 12 iterations) details but could > not replicate it. Try turning up the logging to get more information about > why the nsec3param

Re: DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-24 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 2011-01-24 14:34, Kalman Feher pisze: > I assume you did add the nsec3param record via nsupdate after adding the > zone? I note that there is an NSEC entry there, which is not right. > Yes, with nsupdate. and lack of NSEC3PARAM was very odd.

Re: DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-24 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 2011-01-21 15:17, Kalman Feher pisze: >> Perhaps we are getting close to the problem then. >> Can you show the content of the key files? Specifically the metadata which >> the "maintain" option wants. > >> Since "allow" works I'm assuming that

Re: DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-21 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 2011-01-21 11:23, Kalman Feher pisze: > The only way I can replicate the behaviour is with dnssec-enable no or with > an unsigned version of the zone in another view. Assuming you've not > overlapped your views in such a way (it was a very contr

Re: DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-21 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 2011-01-19 18:38, Hauke Lampe pisze: > Another thing you might check: > > With "dnssec-enable no;" in named.conf, BIND still does its automatic > DNSSEC signing but won't add RRSIG to responses. > > I ran across such a configuration lately. Y

Re: DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-19 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 2011-01-19 14:24, Kalman Feher pisze: > Try without +short ;) > I also have the habit of using that and can get caught out. Remember that > +short only includes the answer, which is not the RRSIG you are hoping to > see. > RRSIG is _the_ answe

Re: DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-19 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 2011-01-17 15:39, Kalman Feher pisze: > Have you tried more sane times? > > Those don't look like sensible times even for a test, which is probably why > BIND isn't signing. I think you are below the sensitivity level for BIND to > sign automat

DNSSEC auto-dnssec issue bind-9.7.2-P3

2011-01-17 Thread Zbigniew Jasiński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I have my test zone example configured with option auto-dnssec maintain; zone "example" { type master; file "var/zone/example"; allow-update { loopback; }; allow-transfer { trusted; loopback; }; auto-d