Hello all, I have a small problem, and I was wondering if someone could help
me. My bind9 dns gets a query for loopback. I have tried and tried to define
the word loopback in the dns as a forward zone with reverse loopkup, but
doesn't seem to take. I have tried to CNAME it using localhost, but
set bind-users mail
==
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This
message contains c
I want to thank everyone for their input. It sounds like they do need the
reverse address entries in specific circumstances so I'm going to recommend
that they add them.
Thank you.
From: Leonard Mills [mailto:l...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:52 PM
To: Ward, Mike S; bind-
Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for a zone? I
have asked some of the admins here and the consensus from them is that only A
records are necessary. Is this true?
==
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended
Hello all, I was trying to follow the thread on the NXDOMAIN and got lost. :) I
have a question about using forwarders. If the DNS that is using forwarders
receives a query for a zone it's not authoritative for even if it's in the same
network, does it go to the forwarders for zone information?
Sounds like they are using BGP for routing. That's probably the way we are
going to go. That way we don't have to make any crazy changes in our bind
configurations. Thanks all for the replies.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+mward=ssfcu@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-b
Hello all, I was wondering if someone could me out.
I am using Bind 9.2 on a Redhat Linux server. We have two ISPS on separate
networks Lets call them A and B. My Linux Server can listen on A's Network as
well as B's network.
I'm using fictitious IPs and names
A 111.111.111.1
7 matches
Mail list logo
