On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 10:06 Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 7:06 AM Tom Browder wrote:
>
>> I have two remote servers: (1) one with one
>>
> ...
> Question: Can I use one or both servers as authoritative bind dns servers,
>> or should I get one or
I have two remote servers: (1) one with one IP (used mainly for backups)
which is planned to be an OpenStreetmap tile server and (2) one with five
IP addresses used for serving my personal websites with Apache and planned
to be a mail server.
Note I am currently running mostly static sites but am
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:17 Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
...
> I suggest
> - replace X.TLD. with "@" (BIND uses this as current origin)
>
> the result is:
>
> @ IN A 142.54.186.2
> @ IN MX 10 mail.example.com.
> @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx -all"
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 17:32 Grant Taylor via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
...
> I would encourage you to contemplate adding DNSSEC support. DNSSEC will
> enable multiple other options down the road.
I plan to do all that, including running my own nameservers with bind. But
th
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 17:25 Alan Clegg wrote:
> Now you broke the A record. Get rid of the trailing dot.
>
Done.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@li
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
...
> I have a single remote server with one IP address (142.54.186.2) I am using
> it to host multiple, independent domains. I am working on configuring a
> single postfix instance to serve mail for all domains (assuming I can
>
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:58 PM, John Miller wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> You'll want to change your MX records to point to the name, rather
> than the IP, of your mail server. Note that your MX target does _not_
> have to be in the same domain as the one it's serving mail for. For
> example:
>
> X.TLD
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> MX record needs a name and not an IP address. Beyond that, seems fine.
Thanks, Alan.
-Tom
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-user
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:01 PM, wrote:
> MX records cannot point to an IP address. try this:
>
> x.tld MX 10 x.tld.
Thanks, William!
-Tom
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 14:54 McDonald, Daniel (Dan)
wrote:
>
> I don’t believe you can use an IP address in an MX record. You should use
> X.TLD instead, or more likely whatever the main address of the server is
> (whatever the reverse address resolves to)'
...
> You don’t have an SOA record,
I have a single remote server with one IP address (142.54.186.2) I am using
it to host multiple, independent domains. I am working on configuring a
single postfix instance to serve mail for all domains (assuming I can
successfully rewrite appropriate parts of mail in and out).
>From referring to
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 04:06 Alberto Colosi wrote:
> as just said inside previous mail
>
> ever if you edit some , you should understand
>
Thanks for your help and good links, Alberto.
-Tom
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> How does one install bind9 from source and set it up to work with systemd?
>
> I copied a bind9.service file from a Debian 9 package installation but
> I think it's more complicated than that.
Sorry, I should have looked a
How does one install bind9 from source and set it up to work with systemd?
I copied a bind9.service file from a Debian 9 package installation but
I think it's more complicated than that.
Thanks.
-Tom
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listi
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:34 AM, John Miller wrote:
> In some cases, running BIND on a web server is exactly what you'd want
> to be doing anyway for its caching function. If you're doing reverse
...
> Of course, you don't have to use BIND to get the benefits of a caching
> NS, but if you need to
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 05:42 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 19.07.2017 um 12:37 schrieb Tom Browder:
> > I want to host my own DNS servers, but I need the master to share Bind
> > with other services, specifically Apache 2.4, Postfix 3.3, and Mailman 3.
> besides th
I want to host my own DNS servers, but I need the master to share Bind with
other services, specifically Apache 2.4, Postfix 3.3, and Mailman 3.
Is there any reason that is not possible?
If not, are there any problems or configuration issues I will need to
address?
Thanks.
With warmest regards,
On Monday, September 5, 2016, John Levine wrote:
> >1. pick a primary domain from the list of virtual hosts (example2.com)
> >2. use the "real" host name of the server (juvat.example1.com)
> >3. the mail server name (mail.example1.com)
> >4. the dns server name (ns2.example1.com)
> >5. anoth
I have two remote servers, one with one IPv4 address, and one with
five IPv4 addresses. My ISP will provide reverse mapping for all if I
provide the desired rDNS record for each address.
The rDNS record for the one-address server is not a problem, but I
would appreciate opinions on the choice of
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Woodworth, John R <
john.woodwo...@centurylink.com> wrote:
>
> I have a slightly unorthodox view on this which may even offer a bit more
>
> security. The answers are listed below inline.
>
> ...
Thanks, John.
Best regards,
-Tom
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016, Cathy Almond wrote:
> On 28/08/2016 02:48, Lyle wrote:
> > Use any in the allow stanza.
>
> You'll be using a shared key for this to work anyway, but I'd suggest
> being slightly more paranoid than 'any' in the allow stanza - perhaps
> the address range in which your
On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Lyle wrote:
> On 08/27/16 10:54, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> https://calomel.org/dynamic_dns_ddns.htmlMy plan is to have two
>
> 2. Can I use rndc from my local host which doesn't have a fixed ip address?
>
> ...
> Let me Google that for y
On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Lyle wrote:
...
> As far as question 2, depends on if the reverse zones were delegated to
> you or not. It depends on your ISP. Many do not delegate reverse lookup
> zones to the end user. In that case, you have to ask them to insert the
> records you think necessa
On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Saturday, August 27, 2016, Tom Browder > wrote:
>
>> My plan is to have two remote, authoritative name servers (master and
>> slave) for my owned domains. I would like to use rndc to control them from
>> my
On Saturday, August 27, 2016, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:47:36AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
> > I do not control 3-octet networks but need reverse mapping for my
> > mail server.
>
> Discuss that with your ISP or netblock owner.
...
Thanks for the go
My plan is to have two remote, authoritative name servers (master and
slave) for my owned domains. I would like to use rndc to control them from
my local host.
A couple of questions:
1. Does named need to be running on the local host?
2. Can I use rndc from my local host which doesn't have a fi
I do not control 3-octet networks but need reverse mapping for my mail
server.
Two questions:
1. Where is the doc that completely describes the allowable reverse mapping
zone file names?
2. When running my own authoritative name servers, do I need reverse
mapping for anything other than my singl
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 20.08.2015 um 00:53 schrieb Tom Browder:
>> I have a single server with access to several IP addresses from my
...
>> I would like to run my own DNS server but I only have the one server
...
> they have to be on differe
I have a single server with access to several IP addresses from my
dedicated host provider. They do not provide DNS service so I
currently use my domain registrar.
I would like to run my own DNS server but I only have the one server
(with 5 IP addresses). Is it possible (and permitted) to run D
29 matches
Mail list logo
