Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-17 Thread Techs_Maru
Hi, Thanks to me to politely reply. 2014-12-17 15:16 GMT+09:00 Evan Hunt : > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 01:30:35PM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: >> However, >> if the value of the default "7" would be the value that was created >> based on the world data ? >>

Re: [question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-16 Thread Techs_Maru
know the recommended settings for everyone to values. regards. Maru 2014-12-16 15:34 GMT+09:00 Evan Hunt : > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:13:17AM +0900, Techs_Maru wrote: >> But, "max-recursion-depth", >> However, it tried but it did not become a Servfail. >>

[question] new bind option "max-recursion-depth"

2014-12-15 Thread Techs_Maru
Hi, Bind-user folks, I have a question, about Vulnerability CVE-2014-8500 new bind option "max-recursion-depth", I do not know this option meaning. I read ARM Documents I used Bind Version is 9.9.6-P1. -- max-recursion-depth Sets the maximum number of levels of re

Re: Split DNS(view configuration)

2014-05-20 Thread Techs_Maru
2014-05-20 20:46 GMT+09:00 Tony Finch : > There are two options: > > You can have one view that slaves the zone from the master, and the other > view slaves the zone from the first view. > > Or you can have an authoritative view that slaves the zone from the > master, and a recursive view that has

Re: Split DNS(view configuration)

2014-05-20 Thread Techs_Maru
2014-05-20 1:26 GMT+09:00 Tony Finch : > I think it is better to use named's built-in root hints, so you don't need > to explicitly configure this. Thank you for your advices. > You must not share slave zone files between zones. > > > }; > > }; > > > The content of internal view is not u

Re: Split DNS(view configuration)

2014-05-19 Thread Techs_Maru
BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB www.hoge.com +short 192.168.1.1 >From source YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY dig @BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB www.hoge.com +short 10.10.10.10 The content of internal view is not updated even if it updates record. I want to let both view reflect an update record by zonal transfer. Cannot the thing re

Re: Split DNS(view configuration)

2014-05-19 Thread Techs_Maru
Sorry,The description was forgotten. BIND1 is Master, and BIND2 is Slave. There is a restriction that cannot make zone of BIND2 Master by manually. 2014-05-19 20:44 GMT+09:00 Techs_Maru : > Hi, > > There is a question though "Split DNS(view configuration)" is used. &

Split DNS(view configuration)

2014-05-19 Thread Techs_Maru
Hi, There is a question though "Split DNS(view configuration)" is used. In the case of the structure such as the following, --- --- The zone is forwarded only to "View internal" because it matches it internal. I want to forward hoge.zone of BIND1