Re: named and use of resolv.conf? - how to "learn" this

On 08/02/2016 04:01 PM, Ray Bellis wrote: > On 02/08/2016 19:47, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > >> In the authoritative configuration, BIND has no need to do DNS lookups >> of its own, so it wouldn't be any use there. > > That's not strictly true - BIND will in some circumstances use its own > interna

named and use of resolv.conf? - how to "learn" this

(I've done several searches for this first but the general nature of some of these terms returned way too many non-relevant responses) I was recently told that named does not use resolv.conf when resolving names. This was not something I was aware of but at this point I accept that. The system

Building from source and running in chroot environment

Are there relatively recent instructions on how to build BIND from source and run it in a chroot environment? It sounds obvious but everything I've come across assumes BIND is provided by some package manager or included with the operating system. I'd like to build the latest version of BIND and

Re: How to prevent BIND from resolving addresses in logs

ddresses in logs > To: "Spumonti Spumonti" > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Date: Thursday, September 27, 2012, 5:11 PM > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Spumonti > Spumonti wrote: > > > I just installed BIND 9.9.1-P3 from source and while > looking through > > t

How to prevent BIND from resolving addresses in logs

I just installed BIND 9.9.1-P3 from source and while looking through the query log files I noticed that IP addresses were being resolved: 27-Sep-2012 12:01:56.512 client 192.168.5.10#44863 (host.foo.com): query: www.ibm.com ... In my other servers which are running the redhat packaged versi