bind 9.6-esv-r6rc1 crashed with assert on rbtdb.c:1552

2012-02-12 Thread Sergey V. Lobanov
no_response = #10 0x081c01cc in dispatch (manager=) at task.c:859 dispatch_count = 0 finished = requeue = isc_boolean_false task = 0xb2dfcb00 #11 run (uap=0xb7344008) at task.c:1002 No locals. #12 0xb76ea7b9 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 No symbol

Re: BIND 9.6-ESV-R6rc1 is now available

2012-01-24 Thread Sergey V. Lobanov
of the hash table the configuration parser uses to keep track of loaded zones and allowing it to grow dynamically to better handle systems with large numbers of zones. [RT #26523] -- wbr, Sergey V. Lobanov ___ Please visit https

Re: maximum number of FD events (64) received

2010-09-27 Thread Sergey V. Lobanov
.3.el5 What is the meaning of these messages ? Are they related to the system file descriptors ? ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- wbr, Se

Re: bind 9.6-esv-r1 segfault

2010-09-26 Thread Sergey V . Lobanov
ps://www.isc.org/software/bind/news > > We'll need the core dump, the binary that generated it and the libs > associated with the binary (ldd named should capture the list we need) > in order to analyze it. > > Thanks, > > Cathy > > On 24/0

Re: bind 9.6-esv-r1 segfault

2010-09-24 Thread Sergey V. Lobanov
\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\3 36\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336\336", } Any ideas? On 09/24/2010 09:13 AM, Sergey V. Lobanov wrote: Yesterday Bind has crashed with the following error: # grep segfault messages Sep 23 20:21:1

bind 9.6-esv-r1 segfault

2010-09-23 Thread Sergey V. Lobanov
2.6.32.13-0.4-pae #1 SMP 2010-06-15 12:47:25 +0200 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux bind configuration options: $ ./configure --enable-largefile --enable-ipv6 --enable-epoll --enable-threads -- wbr, Sergey V. Lobanov ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users