Re: unable to delzone

2020-10-13 Thread Scott A. Wozny
her suggestions, I'd recommend turning up the logging level on named and comparing operations or doing them under strace and seeing where success and failure diverge. Best of luck, Scott From: BÖSCH Christian Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:23 AM To: Scot

Re: unable to delzone

2020-10-12 Thread Scott A. Wozny
There are a LOT of possibilities why this isn't working. The first two things I'd check is trying this action again as root (if you're not already) to make sure this action isn't trying something that's DAC prohibited and checking the SELinux / AppArmor log (if you're running them) to see if th

Re: NS failover as opposed to A record failover

2020-02-26 Thread Scott A. Wozny
Tony Finch Sent: February 26, 2020 10:05 AM To: Scott A. Wozny Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: NS failover as opposed to A record failover Scott A. Wozny wrote: > > Failures aside, I’m worried about creating a bad user experience EVERY > time I need to take a DNS server dow

Re: NS failover as opposed to A record failover

2020-02-26 Thread Scott A. Wozny
Thanks for the feedback, Bob. This is encouraging news. I think now I need to do some testing to see what works best for my application. Scott From: Bob Harold Sent: February 26, 2020 9:02 AM To: Mark Andrews Cc: Scott A. Wozny ; bind-users@lists.isc.org

Re: NS failover as opposed to A record failover

2020-02-26 Thread Scott A. Wozny
Thanks very much for the feedback. I clearly have more research to do. :) Scott From: Mark Andrews Sent: February 25, 2020 6:38 PM To: Scott A. Wozny Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: NS failover as opposed to A record failover > On 26 Feb 2

NS failover as opposed to A record failover

2020-02-25 Thread Scott A. Wozny
I know this isn’t a question ABOUT BIND, per se, but I think is still a question bind-users might have an answer to. I’ve seen various failover questions on the list, but nothing that talks specifically about NS records (at least nothing in the last decade), so I thought I’d inquire here. I’m

Re: Advice on balancing web traffic using geoip ACls

2020-02-23 Thread Scott A. Wozny
utlr Cc: bind-users Subject: Re: Advice on balancing web traffic using geoip ACls On Feb 23, 2020, at 6:57 AM, @lbutlr mailto:krem...@kreme.com>> wrote: On 22 Feb 2020, at 18:25, Scott A. Wozny mailto:sawo...@hotmail.com>> wrote: I’m setting up hot-hot webserver clusters hosted on

Re: Advice on balancing web traffic using geoip ACls

2020-02-23 Thread Scott A. Wozny
hile if it allows you to concentrate on your unique value proposition. Timothe Litt ACM Distinguished Engineer -- This communication may not represent the ACM or my employer's views, if any, on the matters discussed. On 22-Feb-20 20:25, Scott A. Wozny wrote: Greetin

Re: Advice on balancing web traffic using geoip ACls

2020-02-23 Thread Scott A. Wozny
b traffic using geoip ACls On 22 Feb 2020, at 18:25, Scott A. Wozny wrote: > I’m setting up hot-hot webserver clusters hosted on the west and east coasts > of the US and would like to use Bind 9.11.4 I’d consider changing that version. While Bind 9.11 *is* still supported, it is EOL at

Re: Advice on balancing web traffic using geoip ACls

2020-02-23 Thread Scott A. Wozny
ice on balancing web traffic using geoip ACls Hi there, On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, Scott A. Wozny wrote: > Greetings BIND gurus, Sorry, I can't make any claim to be a BIND guru. > ... webserver clusters hosted on the west and east coasts of the US > and would like to use Bind 9.11.4

Advice on balancing web traffic using geoip ACls

2020-02-22 Thread Scott A. Wozny
Greetings BIND gurus, I’m setting up hot-hot webserver clusters hosted on the west and east coasts of the US and would like to use Bind 9.11.4 with the Maxmind GeoIP database to split the traffic about evenly between those clusters. Most of the traffic will be from the US so what I would like