$GENERATE and then actually delegating with
0-63.10.in-addr.arpa. IN NS ns1.edu.
64-127.10.in-addr.arpa. IN NS ns2.edu.
etc
Where I'm confused (or have confused myself) is the part about wanting to
actually break the zone up (I want to break it up for the usual reasons -
hough not round-robinning).
Multiple masters is not about losing contact, it's about getting the
most up-to-date version of the zone. There's no reason for the slave to
A HA! So the answer to my original question, after all this, is "Yes"
(this is expected behavior).
Thank
On 07/22/10 19:57, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article,
Peter Laws wrote:
I have multiple interfaces on my master and multiple interfaces on most of
my slaves.
Is that expected behavior?
Yes. What if the first server stops getting updates, but the second one
does and has a higher
em to be the case however. In fact, in a few cases
I've seen it seems to use both, though not round-robinning that I can see
from the logs.
Is that expected behavior?
BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
Univ
Hey! A firewall setting was wrong! Imagine that!
Thanks, all. :-)
On 07/09/10 14:18, Peter Laws wrote:
On 07/09/10 02:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.07.10 14:42, Peter Laws wrote:
BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
From the host itself, a slave for all my zones, I can
On 07/09/10 02:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.07.10 14:42, Peter Laws wrote:
BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
From the host itself, a slave for all my zones, I can resolve all my
zones. I cannot, however, resolve anything else.
For example, if I dig google.com I get a
Yep, zone for hint is right. No interesting messages "service named
checkconfig" (which RH has helpfully set up to run named-checkconf and
named-checkzone) shows that all is well.
:-(
On 07/08/10 15:55, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
BIN
y thing different on this host vs my other slaves is some extra
notifies and allow-transfers from when this was still a master for some
zones (some other slaves *still* get a few zones from this host).
Missing something easy, I'm sure. But what?
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Cent
On 06/21/10 14:06, Justin T Pryzby wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 01:46:55PM -0500, Peter Laws wrote:
What do they mean? I can't find them and yes, I've googled and also
grepped the docs on isc.org ...
Googling for symbols isn't easy..
http://www.isc.org/files/arm96.html#the_
What do they mean? I can't find them and yes, I've googled and also
grepped the docs on isc.org ...
I'm assuming it's some way of telling if the query was serviced or not ...
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of
work inside of view statements.
Why not just have named run on as many interfaces as needed and let views
sort it out? Views don't need to care which physical interface traffic is
on.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Infor
038"
Post-Its are great, but they often fall off the monitor. This is a
superior solution and has the benefit of being remotely accessible.
Thanks for the "pro tip"!
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma
On 05/08/10 17:36, Chris Thompson as IP Register wrote:
On May 7 2010, Peter Laws wrote:
If he has a small number of slaves, the OP may not need a Tardis. It's
If you do this, you need to restart BIND on the slave to have it notice
the change. Similarly you can "touch" t
ail.com
Funny, yes, but whois doesn't seem to point to M$ in any way. Independent?
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
---
that policy may need review. If the OP serves his organization's DNS, it's
pretty darn critical that customers be able to resolv their DNS info.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Informatio
On 05/06/10 13:27, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
They can't fool us - we know it was caused by the J server DNSSEC issue.
Damn that DNSSEC!!! :-D
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@o
On 05/03/10 16:19, Mark Andrews wrote:
The test is a rough guide to the maximum packet size supported by the path.
So what would be the point of using edns-udp-size to something even
smaller? None I can see ...
What am I missing?
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network
not on the dns-oarc.net page either, but I'm glad you mentioned it.
Back to explicitly setting edns-udp-size to something smaller than the
default, which seems to be 4096. Still not convinced this is necessary.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
Un
re and there are far beyond my control
(and the other 4 only marginally :-).
Besides, we've seen one example where setting it smaller results in yet a
smaller result.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Informatio
e, sorry to say. Interestingly, it didn't come
up (directly) during the Educause webinar about DNSSEC last week (.edu will
be signed in July).
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Okla
a
chicken-and-egg problem.
This is what I thought but thought I'd make doubly certain. Thanks!
Peter
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technolo
el5_4.2 if it matters.
Peter
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
---
Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, cra...@ou.edu.
.
masters { IPofserver1;
IPofserver2;
};
Our architecture is sub-optimal (among other things, hardest hit of all
public servers is the master) and this is one more step towards getting out
from under that.
I'd love to have a master that wasn't even a published DNS server, but
we're
Chris Buxton wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
And I right in thinking that, on a slave, I can have multiple masters
designated for a particular zone? I just have to make sure that the slave that
is pretending to be the master allows transfers, right?
Don't f
problem?
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
---
Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, cra...@ou.edu. Thank you
idea, then I
need to tell my clients why ?
Thanks
Ram
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Wea
!!!
As far as I know, $GENERATE supports only A, PTR, CNAME.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
---
Feedback? Contact my director
use views would help, but
we'd like to avoid that, at least for now.
Any quick fixes?
I checked, and per the MS-People, MS-DNS cannot put ACLs on particular
records. Neither can BIND, so no surprise there.
Which rock do I need to look under?
--
Peter Law
led with the transfer-* settings and made the quota errors go away.
Underlying issue seems to be traffic being intermittently blocked between
the master and the slaves. Not really a BIND issue.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of
Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:58 -0500, Peter Laws wrote:
Looked in the docs but find no mention of how to set a quota
(would like it to be infinite).
Be careful what you wish for ...
You may not need it any greater than it is.
In my experience
Looked in the docs but find no mention of how to set a quota (would like it
to be infinite).
Mar 11 15:53:57.103 xfer-out: IXFR request denied: quota reached
Assume there is a default quota of some sort that can be overridden?
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network
as fast as IPv6, maybe faster :), so maybe it /is/ time
to update the naming standards.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
--
e added the "exception to
Standard" that your PHBs are requiring.
I've been telling folks that request _ in a name that they can no longer do
that and change it to a -. I tell them that it *works*, but it violates
the standards. No pushback yet.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
Nati
Not ISC BIND specific, but if someone could point me at the magic
incantations to get RHEL 5.2's SELinux to play nice with named's logs
(daemon is serving names fine), I'd be appreciative.
Off-list would be best as this isn't really an ISC BIND issue.
Thanks.
--
Peter L
Bad Thing, especially for mailservers.
Is there a way to use $GENERATE to just "fill the gaps"?
No.
Go look at your slave cache. The dupes pop right out since they have a tab
at the beginning (since first few fields are the same). That's how I
identified ours.
Well, m
35 matches
Mail list logo
