Well, I'm going to run the modified bind on a local testbed disconnected of
internet.
So, no worries on others, this is just for test, and aid with actual protocol
development.
Thanks on the hint, now I have to find out where to dig first.
Any knowledge?
On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Jan-Piet M
d most other RR
types do?
would that require me to go too deep on the src?
On Sep 13, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Onha Choe wrote:
>
>> Im trying to make a new addressing scheme, and want to use bind to provide
>> name service.
>
Im trying to make a new addressing scheme, and want to use bind to provide name
service.
The addressing is not compatible with known ones, and thus need to extend to
support mine.
Is there any way to do this? preferably innately supported by bind9?
__
3 matches
Mail list logo