On Sun, Dec 20 2020, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> On 21 Dec 2020, at 06:04, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 18:08, Nicolas Bock
>> wrote:
>> Thanks Mark. Am I correct then that I need to either convince the
>> administra
SES aware. It
> will need to be updated for you to validate through it.
>
> --
> Mark Andrews
>
> > On 19 Dec 2020, at 05:07, Nicolas Bock
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Thanks so much for the reply. I ran this command and am
> > gett
On Fri, Dec 18 2020, John Thurston wrote:
> We have been using the ISC COPR packages for BIND on CentOS. With the
> demise of CentOS, we (along with a few other people on the planet) need
> to consider where we will move our applications.
>
> We have been completely happy with the packages provi
kQWXaBcBo//NUX2asBLus8S7sJ9BDxpGUAsS9o+TdRlq YkIHBA==
>
> ;; Query time: 0 msec
> ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
> ;; WHEN: Fri Dec 18 12:38:34 AEDT 2020
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 395
>
> [beetle:~] marka%
>
>
>> On 18 Dec 2020, at 11:36, Nicolas Bock wrote:
>
Hi,
When I configure my named to forward to our corporate DNS
servers (10.0.0.2 and 10.0.0.3), I end up getting error
messages such as
Dec 17 20:58:06 dns-server named[843946]: fetch: www.canonical.com/A
Dec 17 20:58:06 dns-server named[843946]: fetch: com/DS
Dec 17 20:58:06
5 matches
Mail list logo
