Re: BIND and DNSSEC

2012-11-01 Thread Kobus Bensch
;Alan Clegg" To: "Kobus Bensch" Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent: Thursday, 1 November, 2012 11:26:31 AM Subject: Re: BIND and DNSSEC On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Kobus Bensch wrote: > Is that because split horizon doubles admin or because its bad all together? > > I have

Re: BIND and DNSSEC

2012-11-01 Thread Kobus Bensch
Hi Is that because split horizon doubles admin or because its bad all together? I have been using split horizon for many years now and found it very useful. Any thoughts from any on the list would be most welcomed. Kobus - Original Message - From: "Alan Clegg" To: "Ko

Re: BIND and DNSSEC

2012-11-01 Thread Kobus Bensch
Thank you for this. Had a look and it seems fairly easy. Not sure if that is a flippant remark. A question: is implementing dnssec a good enough reason to abandon split horizon DNS? Kobus Sent from my iPhone On 1 Nov 2012, at 02:01, Feng He wrote: > 于 2012-10-31 23:05, Kobus Bensch

BIND and DNSSEC

2012-10-31 Thread Kobus Bensch
Hi Can anybody point me in the direction of a good guide on setting up BIND split horizon DNS and DNSSEC? Thanks in advance Kobus -- ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users