everybody pays.
Since we have Paul's attention here my question is will he incorporate
DNScurve into BIND now or does he intend to wait until it becomes an RFC?
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
AIC is a joke. "I" root
server in Beijing is still down. Where is SAIC on that.
>
> The plan I am putting together for the inculsives will generate some new
> fire under the pants of these obstructionists and they will find that a
> better mousetrap can be built.
>
Th
Looks like the future of the DNSSEC make work project includes resolution
failures here and there. More security - less stability - guaranteed
slavery. I wounder if it's a fair trade.
we'll see ..
regards
joe baptista
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Chris Thompson wrote:
> O
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> > dnssec-enable yes;
> > and
> > dnssec-validation yes;
> >
> > are the defaults since BIND 9.5
> >
> >
> > How do I turn it off.
>
> S
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
>
> dnssec-enable yes;
> and
> dnssec-validation yes;
>
> are the defaults since BIND 9.5
>
>
How do I turn it off.
Thanks
joe
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.is
S.
>
It's going to be interesting to watch. I guess that depends on if DNSSEC is
turned on by default in BIND. Incidentally - is it?
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
or DNScurve.
>
Done.
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
s
per day at OpenDNS are DNScurve compatible.The traffic in DNSSEC is chicken
feed compared to DNScurve.
> When we do, I'll be happy to write the
> code.
>
It's happened - start writing.
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
being spent on
the DNSSEC make work project - time and energy wasted.
DNScurve installs - configures and runs. No need for a make work project.
agreed?
regards
joe baptista
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Michael Sinatra <
mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> On 02/23/10 18:31, Joe
Now that OpenDNS the largest provider of public DNS supports DNSCurve
http://twitter.com/joebaptista/status/9555178362
Would it be possible to include DNScurve support in bind?
thanks
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
e NS the localhost and assign localhost the A record of
127.0.0.1. Or lets say the name server is at 172.16.30.31 then you can do as
follows
NS any.domain.name
any.domain.name A 172.16.30.31
* A 172.16.30.30
That will work too.
regards
joe baptista
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
to do that.
regards
joe baptista
If you need help get back to me privately.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:50 PM, fddi wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to setup a local named configuration so that ANY request will be
> resolved
> to a specific single IP only.
>
> I mean any kind of DNS resol
Since we have been talking about DNS recently here is an audio interview by
NPR with DNS inventor Dr. Paul Mockapetris
quote: *"A friend of mine said I was smart enough to invent the DNS, but not
smart enough to own it,"
*
http://bit.ly/8iSEql
This link guaranteed free of evil
(
confusion.
> The browser has to understand IDN. Most current browsers do, including (I
> believe) IE 7 and later, Firefox 2 and later, and Safari 3 and later.
>
>
Does anyone have a list of idn domains? I'd like to try it out.
cheers
joe baptista
does this. I don't know - the last time I tested this was back when
Ubuntu 7.?? was released. Don't remember the exact date and the only browser
I tested it on was Firefox.
Have you tried other browsers? And what browser(s) have you tested this on.
You have hit on a very important point
n the
old days.
As for you question concerning the browser converting the domain to punycode
before asking a nameserver - yes that is what some browsers do. I'm not sure
why because it must confuse some users when that happens.
regards
joe baptista
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Kai Szyman
root gave an answer instead of NXDOMAIN these queries would go away.
regards
joe baptista
On 8/28/09, John Horne wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I noticed one of the root servers stats
> (
> http://stats.l.root-servers.org/cgi-bin/dsc-grapher.pl?window=604800&plot=qtype_vs_invalid_tl
best
avoided at all costs.
cheers
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptista
www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative &
Accountable to
I don't think buddha cares much for bind.
cheers
joe baptista
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:26 PM, fakessh wrote:
> nb : "Buddha" peace themselve
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:41:17 -0400, Joe Baptista
> wrote:
> > You guys get excited over small potatoes. Th
You guys get excited over small potatoes. There are hundreds of millions of
potential DLV RRsets. This is not even a drop in the bucket.
cheers
joe baptista
p.s. this message does not imply i support dnssec deployment. dnscurve is
the solution to our woes http://bit.ly/pJVq4
On Thu, Jul 30
yes - you can do that. and even assign the same NS or other if you want. a
domain can be very large to the human eye. I'm not sure how many characters
- but more then 200 I think.
Go crazy.
regards
joe baptista
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Dan Letkeman wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
could find their national university at
digger.
My two two cents ;)
joe baptista
> <http://www.domaintools.com/reverse-ip/>
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jay Ess
- so sad it has limited
vision of the name space. But I'm sure it will improve.
cheers
joe baptista
- thats one recommend bookmark ;)
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Jay Ess wrote:
> DNSDigger.com - A massive reverse resolver that lets you dig deeper into
> the Net.
>
> DNSD
ot; to the end of TM - it works, example:
bapti...@baptista-laptop:/tmp/test.temp$ ping tm.
PING tm (193.223.78.213) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from serv213.icb.co.uk (193.223.78.213): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51
time=96.2 ms
Like I said - not recommended - but it does work - sort of.
regards
joe bapt
. 86400 IN A 64.251.31.234
TM. 86400 IN A 193.223.78.213
UZ. 14400 IN A 195.158.1.25
WS. 21600 IN A 63.101.245.10
Cheers
Joe Baptista
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Joe Baptista wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
mmended because it does not
always work depending on the application. If the application relies solely
on gethostbyname then it will probably work - but some applications do a bit
more checking of the domain name and not all applications will allow it.
cheers
joe baptista
--
Joe Baptista
www
Unifiedroot is a scam. I suggest you do some due diligence on them before
you pay them any money. Let them know I gave you this heads up - I'm sure
they will appreciate it.
cheers
joe baptista
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:48 AM, ozgurs wrote:
> We want to buy a unified root domain,
&g
27 matches
Mail list logo
