I agree. Banning them because you disagree with what they say ? You have
shares in facebook ? TikTok ? Federal Govt ?
On 2024-08-23 7:19 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
The user was angry and ranted about named 9.18.x. He did not rant
about any developer or any member of your team. Removing a user fr
Is there an easy way in the named.conf logging to
have ALL logging go to local2 ?
I've created:
logging {
channel syslog-local2 {
syslog local2;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
};
category default { syslog-local2; };
category general {
t;0/25.z.y.x.in-addr.arpa" {
...
...
}
...and in the zone file:
1 PTR some.host.
...
as normal.
HTH,
-John
From: Jim Pazarena
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Date: 01/20/2014 01:43 PM
Subject:classless ptr setup
Sent by:bind-users-bounces+johnh=primebuchholz...
I have a full /24, which I would like to separate into two /25's, and
assign each half to two of my customers. The snag is that *I* maintain
the DNS for each of these customers.
Is it possible to create the classless setup within my system so that it
starts with the /24 but can assign the two cla
I see in my logs "DNS format error from 205.178.190.53#53 resolving
excelwetsuits.com/MX for client 207.34.147.83#54521: invalid response"
The client is *my* mail server IP.
I am wondering is this error on MY side or their's ? It doesn't sound
like it.
If it's on their end.. how far should someo
I set up a subnet on my server, complete with rdns, and ARIN has been
adjusted for my two dns servers (ns.qcislands.net & ns2.qcislands.net)
the subnet: 23.235.75.0/24
if you do a lookup of, for instance: 23.235.75.10
and bounce that nslookup off of other dns servers, SOME say:
Authoritative an
I have a client who has been assigned a /20 from ARIN.
They asked me to help them with their DNS.
The DNS for me is the easy part. except...
ARIN has told them that you use the DNS to set up the routing so that
the traffic for this /20 gets routed to the correct up-stream provider.
Is this cor
Jim Pazarena wrote, On 2013-02-07 9:31 AM:
my named is 9.9.0
while it can resolve "webmail.acrodex.com" ( 139.142.184.10 )
it cannot reverse resolve 139.142.184.10
(example follows).
However, if I do a simply nslookup using goodle DNS.
nslookup 139.142.184.10 8.8.8.8
IT WORKS!
I installed FreeBSD 9.1 on 3 virtually identical HP rack servers.
two of the servers compile bind 9.9.2-P1 as expected.
One however dies because of a bunch of undefined references in
a library file.
a proper ./configure was issued, along with a make; on ALL 3!
I am stumped, and would appreciate s
my named is 9.9.0
while it can resolve "webmail.acrodex.com" ( 139.142.184.10 )
it cannot reverse resolve 139.142.184.10
(example follows).
However, if I do a simply nslookup using goodle DNS.
nslookup 139.142.184.10 8.8.8.8
IT WORKS!
Can anyone suggest where I may be going wrong with this?
my
Jan-Piet Mens wrote, On 2011-11-23 12:21 AM:
I have 1 domain name, and 1 reverse in-addr.arpa
citires.ca and0-127.254.194.207.in-addr.arpa
which my two slaves log that the master is "not authoritative" for
I found the issue!
I had TWO named.conf files for my slaves, one not
Jan-Piet Mens wrote, On 2011-11-23 12:21 AM:
I have 1 domain name
citires.ca
which my two slaves log that the master is "not authoritative" for
Seen from here (.DE) the NS for citires.ca both refuse to answer
queries, so they are indeed not authoritative:
$ dig @ns.qcislands.net
I have 1 domain name, and 1 reverse in-addr.arpa
citires.ca and0-127.254.194.207.in-addr.arpa
which my two slaves log that the master is "not authoritative" for
I have plenty of rdns subnets, and 3 fractional subnets in that group
so my copy & paste of this new /25 looks 100%. y
rds,
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
yup, they're all mine.
but that non-auth kinda bugs me, because for my 'full' /24 subnets,
that never happens. And it's delegated from the same Telco (Telus)
look at ns2.qcislands.net which cleanly resolves back and forth
to 209.53.238.4
O
I've got a fractional subnet 207.34.147.80/28 (.240)
To which my reverse always responds, but claims to be non-authoritative.
Then it points AT MY DNS to be authoritative.
I am unsure, but think it has something to do with way I have described
my in-addr.arpa file.
Would someone please offer sugge
I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions
regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 camp?
If the upstream ISP still provides the end user an ipv4 number
as a gateway, and the end user still has a /24 or /23 assigned by
the ISP, need they be concerne
16 matches
Mail list logo
