M$ has their own take on SPF called Sender ID, which uses a very similar
record -
"v=spf2.0" rather than "v=spf1"
so be sure to read up on them both before publishing records for one or
the other.
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID
Hotmail in particular is picky about what it rejects a
Setting up a slave NS to a master with multiple views. One view is
public, the other is only handed out to a sandbox set of IPs
(registration network).
This older article
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/networking/news/views_0501.html
seems to indicate that the only way to get the sla
2 matches
Mail list logo
