ated). It is fixed and all is working fine now. I see no point in
continuing this thread, so I probably won't be back either :)
Regards
Hamid Maadani
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid s
Hmm.. odd. Understood, let me go fix that.
Appreciate the help.
Regards
Hamid Maadani
December 1, 2022 9:05 AM, "Ondřej Surý" mailto:ond...@isc.org?to=%22Ond%C5%99ej%20Sur%C3%BD%22%20)>
wrote:
test.com (http://test.com/). 0 IN A 10.10.10.10
I think this line just have it
umented somewhere btw?)
My question still stands: shouldn't NS2 answer with AUTHORITY: 1, regardless of
DLZ or local-file backend, since the definition for the zone is as below?
dlz XDB {
database "dlopen /usr/lib/bind/dlz_mongodb_mod.so 0";
search no;
};
zone "te
z XDB;
allow-query { any; };
};
zone "test2.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/ns2/db.test2.com";
allow-query { any; };
};
/etc/bind/ns2/db.test2.com:
$TTL 3600
@ IN SOA ns1.test2.com. admin.test2.com. (
2022111501 ; Serial
7200 ; Refresh
1800 ; Retry
2419200 ; Expire
s to me that any answers coming from a DLZ hosted zone on NS2, are not
treated as an "authresponse" by NS1.
Is that something that needs to be implemented in the DLZ code? My
understanding was that indicating "search no" for DLZ, and setting a specific
zone with type "master&
removed stale configs from NS1, and shut down NS2.
Then verified NS1 cache still has an entry for test.com, and queried NS1 for
test.com
Basically, NS1 does not utilize its own cache at all!
Regards
Hamid Maadani
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe fro
, they are separate processes, so they do not share
any memory unless there is something different in bind that I do not know about.
I still can not figure out why the cache does not work on NS1!
Regards
Hamid Maadani
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
not understanding the stale record concept correctly?
2. Why is the stale answer not available in this scenario, even though stale
answers are enabled and the cache exists and is valid? Am I missing some config
part?
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards
Hamid Maadani
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/
?
Regards
Hamid Maadani
October 4, 2022 2:47 PM, "Evan Hunt" wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 05:28:59PM +, Hamid Maadani wrote:
>
>> Back to DLZs, I see that they are removed from the configure.ac Are
>> they supposed to be built individually now, and not from the ma
Makes sense, thank you.
Back to DLZs, I see that they are removed from the configure.ac
Are they supposed to be built individually now, and not from the main build
system?
Regards
Hamid Maadani
September 12, 2022 5:13 AM, "Petr Špaček" wrote:
> On 24. 08. 22 17:48, hamid wrote
will come to the caching server, and will be served super
fast because they are cached in memory, but the actual records live in a
backend DB somewhere.
Long story short, I was trying to see if the same can be achieved with one
single instance instead of two, which sounds like it can not be done.
on is enabled, then we try the cache,
> and failing that, we recurse.
Question about the cache mentioned here. Can cache be configured to pull from a
DLZ?
As far as I know, the DynDB API is not merged to BIND's codebase yet. In the
absence of that,
is caching from DLZ a possible configura
spin
up a new thread? Trying to figure out how dlz_lookup is called in a
multi-threaded version.
Would appreciate if someone can answer these, or point me in the right
direction if this is not the appropriate forum to ask.
Regards
Hamid Maadani
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/
13 matches
Mail list logo
