i'm wondering if domain.net and ns1.nameserver.net are defaults which haven't
been configured yet. but he is a senior sysadmin, i'm sure he considered that
already…
-g
On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 07.12.10 11:06, Ejaz wrote:
>> We have problem in sending mai
its as if they think hackers main source of targets comes from here.doesn't
appear to really want any help anyway.
-g
On Oct 4, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:29 -0500, Lyle Giese wrote:
>> Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>>> The ports aren't blocked as another s
someone with way more bind clues than I would be able to give you a better
answer.the error returned begs two questions..
1. is this server behind or running a local firewall?
2. is bind actually listening on the proper interface?
you could confirm #2 by typing 'nslookup ns1.example.de 1.1.1
they (the distro maintainers) could not agree to put anything in the same place
if the worlds sanity depended on it.
/var/named
/srv/bind
/etc/bind
/var/lib/named
/usr/local/named
it's all over the place. myself i just create links from /var/named (which is
where I think it was found on most
sorry, 1918, not 1812…
On Aug 10, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Greg Whynott wrote:
> I'd say no, and your ISP may need to gain a working knowledge of bind views
> if they need to resolve 1812 addresses for their own needs without affecting
> customers who are using the ISP DNS se
I'd say no, and your ISP may need to gain a working knowledge of bind views if
they need to resolve 1812 addresses for their own needs without affecting
customers who are using the ISP DNS servers as their resolver.
the way you could fix this without their involvement is to bring up your own
D
thers, the error went away.
thanks again and have a great day,
greg
On Jun 14, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Cathy Almond wrote:
> Greg Whynott wrote:
>> sorry, forgot the subject. not very good on my first posting
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm seeing an unfamiliar er
sorry, forgot the subject. not very good on my first posting
Hello,
I'm seeing an unfamiliar error while attempting to start a newly built from
source named instance. I've search on the net and within the bind-user list
without luck, DST returns lots of hits, but nothing with "named D
Hello,
I'm seeing an unfamiliar error while attempting to start a newly built from
source named instance. I've search on the net and within the bind-user list
without luck, DST returns lots of hits, but nothing with "named DST".
hoping someone here might know what its about. Is it real
9 matches
Mail list logo