On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:16 PM MEjaz wrote:
> 1. My primary name server, /etc/named.conf, and here am forcing transfer
> to only few trusted servers, as mentioned in the below clause.
> transfers-out 2000;
> allow-transfer {212.119.93.5;213.230.0.10; 212.119.93.10; 212.119.92.6;};
> 2. second
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 2:03 PM MEjaz wrote:
>
> Thank you for your emai.
>
>
>
> I am not cutting any logs, I am capturing only for that particular zone
> which I have chooses for the test, as I can't do the test on live zones.
>
> This time I have noticed "denied" in my slave server logs as be
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 7:58 PM MEjaz wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> My setup which has one primary and slave server was working fine since years.
>
> All of sudden I started getting the problem of zones updates on slaves.
> Which are not happening on time. it takes two hours to take the updates.
>
>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Wolfgang Riedel wrote:
> Just wonder if there is some agreed guidance on what steps I SHOULD take
> to get bind-9.11.0-P2 successfully build on Debian 9.0?
>
>
The generic recommendation on debian would probably be 'use whatever the
distro comes with, as they main
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:07 AM, WXR <474745...@qq.com> wrote:
> Is there any reverse proxy software for dns , which can do load
> balance、cache for dns service, just like squid for http service?
>
>
What functionality do you need that can't be provided by bind? e.g.
https://www.safaribooksonline
What are you using this for?
If it's part of a script, it might be easier to just use gethostbyname. For
example, in php: http://php.net/manual/en/function.gethostbyname.php ,
Returns the IPv4 address or a string containing the unmodified hostname on
failure.
--
Fajar
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have a server that is only running bind 9.8.2 (Centos 6.5). It has 2Gb
> memory and free reports ~1.7Gb used.
>
> I am looking at replacing this server with an armv7 board running Redsleeve
> (until Centos 7 is out and stable for armv7)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <53c5e714.5080...@thelounge.net>, Reindl Harald writes:
>> > Can the LDNS return 10.10.10.1 defined in the /etc/hosts to the
>> > client?
>> > maybe some special configuration in named can support this feature
>>
>> wrong tool -
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Edward DeLargy wrote:
>
> > I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
>
> The README says:
>
> Building
>
> BIND 9 currently requires a UNIX system with an ANSI C compiler,
> basic POSIX support, and a 64 bit inte
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Samuel Lentz wrote:
> Thanks. It looks to be good. I did find this once and thought is was to
> good to be true. But after verifying the code is the same, I will be using
> this for further updates.
>
> I understand that CentOS if suppose to be a complete copy of
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Chu Ha Khanh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my output from command. It looks like my bind version is actually 32
> bit. But there are some default applications also 32 bit although all are
> installed on a 64 bit OS. I have to check this for a moment.
Correct.
If you w
> One idea would be to use RHEL but still download and compile your own BIND on
> top of it.
Yup, IIRC there are (S)RPM for latest bind versios posted on this list.
> However, if the only thing on your RHEL server is BIND you have to wonder
> why you're paying RedHat a subscription.
Yeah. If
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Graham Butler wrote:
> We are currently looking at replacing our Solaris boxes with a flavour of
> Linux to run BIND with a focus on Red Hat and Ubuntu. I am trying to collect
> some evidence to which OS is being used to run BIND and why, before we make
> a decision
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Holemans Wim wrote:
>
>
> Wim Holemans
> Netwerkdienst Universiteit Antwerpen
> Network Services University of Antwerp
>
>
> One of the problems is that these firewalls are going to be replaced soon and
> we don't want to spend to much effort in trying to fix what
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
wrote:
> pahlevanzadeh.info. 14400 IN NS shared.pahlevanzadeh.info.
>
> Is it Possible?
Yes. Google does it
$ dig google.com ns
; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> google.com ns
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, sta
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:27 PM, babu dheen wrote:
>
> Dear Fajar,
>
> Below logs taken from Internal DNS server running in Microsoft DNS.
Then why did you ask this list instead of contacting MS support?
> I checked with client AV status, everything is fine( system is up to date
> with DAT fro
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:11 PM, babu dheen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I enabled the logs in DNS server and i found below lines from this client
> continiously..
>
> 1/10/2012 9:14:30 AM 0FDC PACKET 05B489B0 UDP Snd
> 1f23 Q [0005 A D NOERROR] TXT (7)version(4)bind(0)
> 1/10/2012 9
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:37 PM, babu dheen wrote:
> Unfortunately, i have not enabled logs in my internal DNS server.
You just dismissed the only reliable source of information
>
> Any idea ..
Without logs, you only have assumptions. The best assumption at this
point is that the client probably
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:35 PM, DNSbed.com wrote:
> Well, say I want to setup the domain "mydots.net" to use these two NS:
> dwdns1.nsbeta.info
> dwdns2.nsbeta.info
> How can I setup the glue in Godaddy?
Glue records are only needed if the ns is on the same domain. e.g.
nsbeta.info -> NS = dwdns
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:58 AM, DNSbed.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed namecheap's NS servers are five .org hostnames:
>
> namecheap.com. 86400 IN NS ns3.mydyndns.org.
> namecheap.com. 86400 IN NS ns2.mydyndns.org.
> namecheap.com. 86400 IN
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:53 PM, wrote:
>> > For instance, would this be a problem when implementing a
>> > wide area bonjour subdomain using my own local dns server for clients that
>> > are
>> > mobile (internal/external) ?
>>
>> Bonjour should work even without a DNS server.
>
> Reminds me of
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:20 AM, wrote:
> Thanks all. Chris, Anand that's very useful to know, sorry Jeff and Philippe,
> your interesting suggestions wont work in this case.
>
> If I attack the problem from the other way down instead, the fact my current
> registra doesn't allow me to add PTR or
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Jack Tavares wrote:
> Thank you again. And I agree that upgrading is the best option, however
> I was looking for any possible mitigations to the problem for the
> (unfortunately unavoidable) period of time it will take vendors
> to provide patched bind servers.
W
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> but that non-auth kinda bugs me, because for my 'full' /24 subnets,
> that never happens. And it's delegated from the same Telco (Telus)
That's because "full" /24 subnets can be delegated easily using
subdomains, while a /28 needs classless de
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:05 PM, listmail wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 03:33:30 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote
>> If you're concern about what address programs gets when they resolve
>> host names, then getent is a better choice as it also respects
>> nsswitch.conf and
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
>> Use dig.
>>
>> Always use dig.
> I don't quite agree, for debugging bind, use dig - for debugging lookup
> issues on some machine, host will behave more like any normal program, using
> resolv.conf and what else and can point to some issues
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Feng He wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> When I deleted all the entries in /etc/resolv.conf (I am using Linux),
> dig can't work.
> I was thinking since dig is a standard resolver,
what makes you think that? From the man page
dig (domain information groper) is a fle
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:29 AM, vr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to visit "http://communities.intel.com"; using Iceweasel on a
> Debian desktop PC. No proxies.
>
> My clients etc/resolv.conf point to my own Debian BIND 9.7.3 installed on a
> separate server and installed from distribution packa
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:33 PM, wrote:
> on server1(64 bit) i have 2 Intel E5310 quad-core 1.6Ghz and on server2(32
> bit) i have 2 Intel Xeon dual-core 2.33Ghz.
> means 8*1.6 Ghz on server1 and 4*2.33 on server2.
>
> 8*1.6 is better and faster than 4*2.33, no?
Sometimes I wonder if people REAL
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:56 PM, babu dheen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone explain what is DNS tunneling because i am seeing large number of
> DNS tunneling attack in IPS from one machine in the LAN.
Did you try Google?
First entry is very informative: http://www.dnstunnel.de/
--
Fajar
__
add that code.
> Regards.
Now that you're giving more details, hopefuly others will be able to help you.
--
Fajar
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Vignesh Gadiyar
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
&
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Vignesh Gadiyar wrote:
> Hi,
> I am Vignesh from Bangalore and i was developing an application using Open
> source BIND wherein i needed to know where exactly, i mean from which
> function do we get the IP addresses looked up from the Domain names
> inputted, so as
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:45 PM, babu dheen wrote:
>
> Dear Olsen,
>
> thanks for the update. I can follow all the steps but i couldn't understand
> below two points
>
> - register/buy the domain name(s) if you haven't already done so.
> - tell your registrar to configure your parent domain so i
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 12/03/11 12:30 AM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
>> As the prior poster said RedHat is still supports RHEL4 (7 years or
>> more) and RHEL5 (4 years or more) and has now relased RHEL6.
>
> Actually EOL for RHEL4 was announced last month, one more ye
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Dan wrote:
>
> I think there are really 2 sides to this, whether your after an OS easy to
> maintain, with great stability, or best performance. I think you'll fall in
> love with freebsd if you give it a try,
Try explaining that to managerial types who thinks "we
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:52 AM, pollex wrote:
> Hi, I want to know in your experience what is the best operating
> system to run bind for an ISP. We currently have Debian for the 5
> Cache servers and for the 2 Authoritative servers.
> We have around 111851 success querys in the cache servers and
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
>>
>> I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
>
> It isn't a matter of "not liking" it. Given that you have steadfastly
> refused to answer any of the questions from people who are trying
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, khanh rua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I install bind as a cache server on Solaris 10, Sun Sparc T5140. It has
> problem, bind always hang out when named reach to 5-600 Mb ('prstat' check).
How did you determine that it "hang"?
If you enable query log, you might be able to see
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, sasa sasa wrote:
> Hello,
> for a 192.168.199.64/26 in zone file to delegate to a customer;
> should i put subnet number:
> 64/26 IN NS ns1.example.com.
> 64/26 IN NS ns2.example.com.
> or host ranges:
> 64-126 IN NS ns1.example.com.
> 64-126 IN NS ns2.example.com.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
> At present I do not have a 32-bit build environment I can try to natively
> build this on, and was hoping that somebody could suggest how I can get round
> this problem in the build environment I am using.
a generic workaround that has
2009/11/26 万善义 :
> 500,000 domains, with the Ext3 file system, DNS service starts very slow and
> therefore require several hours before they can work properly. For the bind
> file system choices, there are any suggestions advice?
Are you sure it's filesystem issue? ext3 has a feature, dir_index
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Bind wrote:
> The number of requests is 2700 recieved pps and 2500 transmit pps.
> also i forced it to use both cpu`s,(in prstat -a command the STATE
> column,shows named uses cpu0 then after moment it changed to cpu2) but heavy
> cpu load exists.
Assuming:
- the
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Bind wrote:
> Hello
> I have SunFire V880 (2 cpu +4G Ram) and installed bind 9.6.1-P1 on solaris
> 10.
> but my cpu load is very high!(above 90% during the pick time)
> bash-3.00# prstat -a
> PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Subhan Malick wrote:
> On 8/17/09 10:15 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>>
>> Here are some pointers from my experience though:
>> - syslog query logging is expensive. NEVER enable it. If you need to
>> log client queries, log it directly t
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Alans wrote:
> @Matus: let me put it in this way, if I want to create a budget for next
> year for example, then I should know what upgrades I need for next year
> (estimated needs), and let's assume dns queries increase monthly by x hits,
> now, if I know how many
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
> I currently need to compile (a current) BIND on AIX 5.2 and it appears to me
> that there is a little more work involved to get a successful compile on
> this platform vs. others that I have worked with.
Really? And why is that?
>
> Can anyone
46 matches
Mail list logo
