Re: [Ext] Re: Redirect only second and third level domains

2017-02-24 Thread Edward Lewis
On 2/24/17, 03:42, "bind-users on behalf of Andrea Gabellini" wrote: >the server is a resolver for about 20K clients. My goal is to supply a >courtesy page if a domain is not found. For every domain. No approach relying on wildcards will work because of the way wildcards "work." (*.example.com

Re: Testing RFC 5011 key roll

2015-04-21 Thread Edward Lewis
On 4/21/15, 10:15, "Warren Kumari" wrote: > >From the ARM: Sigh, RTFM...(My, BIND's gotten a lot more complicated/feature-rich since I last read the docs.) Hey, it's there. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Please visit https

Re: Testing RFC 5011 key roll

2015-04-21 Thread Edward Lewis
On 4/21/15, 9:45, "Tony Finch" wrote: >rndc secroots > >You can also look in the .mkeys file. I tried secroots with my set up, I got nothing despite the mkeys file. (Kind of asking - does that work?): (I had my rndc port bumped out of sudo-land, so it's overridden:) $ rndc -p 1953 -c rndc.conf

Re: Testing RFC 5011 key roll

2015-04-21 Thread Edward Lewis
say perhaps unnecessary because the information may be available on disk (which an administrator could get to via ssh, perhaps). Ed On 4/20/15, 15:12, "Evan Hunt" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 06:42:42PM +, Edward Lewis wrote: >> Being that I'm working on a laptop (

Re: Testing RFC 5011 key roll

2015-04-20 Thread Edward Lewis
helps knowing where the loose bits are stored.) On 4/20/15, 15:12, "Evan Hunt" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 06:42:42PM +, Edward Lewis wrote: >> Being that I'm working on a laptop (hence on on over the weekend) I've >>had >> to recreate the environment

Re: Testing RFC 5011 key roll

2015-04-20 Thread Edward Lewis
Thanks to Evan for the last look and thanks to Jan-Piet for the suggestion to go to 9.10.2. Being that I'm working on a laptop (hence on on over the weekend) I've had to recreate the environment today. I'm a bit more puzzled now. I've built and installed BIND 9.10.2. Using http://keyroll.system

Re: Testing RFC 5011 key roll

2015-04-17 Thread Edward Lewis
Thanks. Now have 'ad' bits via both BIND and unbound. Will let you know when I've shot myself in the foot. On 4/17/15, 12:45, "Evan Hunt" wrote: ... >instead of waiting a full 30 days. (This is, I hope obviously, *not* >something you want to run in production. :) ) smime.p7s Description: S

Testing RFC 5011 key roll

2015-04-17 Thread Edward Lewis
I am building named and unbound recursive servers to follow a test of RFC 5011 trust anchor updates, the experiment is documented at http://keyroll.systems. One reason why I'm asking here is in http://jpmens.net/2015/01/21/opendnssec-rfc-5011-bind-and-unbound/ which mentions some issues with RFC 5