Re: More than 4k TXT entries

portant compared to the size of the > individual TXT record at a specific name.  There is no maximum that spreads > across names, but there are practical limits. > > If you just have a long string of TXT records, each at its own name like in > your example, you should not be run

Re: More than 4k TXT entries

rote: > more than 4k will exceed the default settings for EDNS0 UDP responses. > > If you dig @ your server, with +tcp, do you get a reply?  If not, perhaps you > are not allowing TCP connections to port 53? > > What error you are getting may be of help. > > --Michael >

More than 4k TXT entries

Hi I would like to know if there is some limitation in Bind regard:    - Max number of TXT entries for a specific domain or    - Max size of a zone file I'm asking this because one of the domains configured in my Bind server have more than 4k TXT entries and its zone file have more than 400K

Re: Max. Number of char in a TXT Record

I thank everyone for the responses. Thank you for your spending a little time with my question. On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Vincent Rivellino wrote: > On Thu, March 26, 2009 19:19, Kevin Darcy wrote: >>> 2) What is the maximum number of includes inside a SFP field? >>> >> I assume you mean S

Max. Number of char in a TXT Record

Hello, I have some questions: 1) Anybody know the maximum number of characters allowed in a TXT field? 2) What is the maximum number of includes inside a SFP field? Sorry for the bad english :( Thanks ! ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.i