3600 IN NS
uz5w6sb91zt99b73bznfkvtd0j1snxby06gg4hr0p8uum27n0hf6cd.free.ns.buddyns.com.
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do
not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
On 16. 5. 2021, at 8:45, Dan Egli via bind-users
wrote:
Upgrade to WHAT? You said it
Upgrade to WHAT? You said it was fixed in 9.11.25, but isn't that a lot
OLDER than 9.16.15, which is what I'm running?
jupiter ~ # named -v
BIND 9.16.15 (Stable Release)
jupiter ~ # dig -v
DiG 9.16.15
On 5/16/2021 12:06 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
On 16 May 2021, at 10:17, Dan Egl
On 5/10/2021 12:38 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Dan Egli wrote:
Still not working for me. The dig doesn't report anything, and I don't HAVE a
keyfile since i'm using inline signing. Or does inline signing still require a
key to be generated?
Yes, you need to do your own key management with inline-sig
Okay, so I added the policy, and things MOSTLY look okay. But when I
retake the verification test, I get errors about no RRSIGs found. What
do I do to resolve that issue?
On 5/10/2021 12:38 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Dan Egli wrote:
Still not working for me. The dig doesn't report anything, and I
4 matches
Mail list logo