DNSSEC Mastery
https://www.michaelwlucas.com/nonfiction/dnssec-mastery
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:54 AM, babu dheen wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to understand DNSSEC on BIND Recusive DNS server running in
> RHEL 5.0. Can you please let me know resource or reference to understand
> the D
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:52 AM, pollex wrote:
> Hi, I want to know in your experience what is the best operating
> system to run bind for an ISP. We currently have Debian for the 5
> Cache servers and for the 2 Authoritative servers.
> We have around 111851 success querys in the cache servers and
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Hoover Chan wrote:
> I'm new to this list but have been having trouble looking for information on
> this topic.
>
> A pointer please to information on how to use BIND to "translate" a domain
> name to a target URL. For example, www.domain ->
> http://www.someoth
I think that's really designed for router ACL's.
Most reliable method might be to subscribe to their BGP feed.
I'm not sure what you'd do with regards to BIND or even why you'd want
to handle it there.
.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in implementing an
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Todd wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> We've run into a problem with our DNS servers. The way we update our
> masters is via a CVS Checkout and reload of the zones modified.
> Sometimes though, we need to reload the whole config for big
> changs/etc. When that happens,
Basically, you have to have a big enough server/cluster of servers, to
absorb an attack.
No real defense from distributed dos.
2009/11/16 MontyRee :
>
> Hello, all.
>
>
> I have operated some dns servers and I'm curious what should I do if
> ddos attck to my dns servers.
>
> So do you know how
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <53d706300907081412r191946eeo5c9a66657bf8e...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Bryan
> Irvine writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
>> > Bryan Irvine wrote:
>> >>
>> &g
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> Bryan Irvine wrote:
>>
>> Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
>>
>>
>
> Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for
> non-address (A/) record
Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
-Bryan
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> Using DNS, I want to do load balancing of client requests among my
> available servers dynamically.
> In realtime requirements, any/many servers among the configured me be
> down or overloaded.
>
> I want to have control over distribution of load to these servers. I
> want to have a common FQDN
10 matches
Mail list logo
