Re: [SOLVED] Re: bind listening on UDP port 53 using 2 fd

AR - fantomas () escribió: > On 25.01.21 14:05, Bernardo wrote: > >Yes. This causes serious problems. > > > >The problem is that these perfectly valid configuration lines in > >/etc/named.conf file (provided that 192.168.10.100 is the IPv4 address of > >your DNS se

Re: [SOLVED] Re: bind listening on UDP port 53 using 2 fd

p;utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> El lun, 25 ene 2021 a las 11:13, Matus UHLAR - fantomas () escribió: > On 23.01.21 12:44, Bernardo wrote: > >Finally I've found the solution. > >The problem seems to be caused by

[SOLVED] Re: BIND ignores "packets received correctly"

combination of settings work again. Hope this helps someone else to avoid loosing a lot of time. Regards, -- Bernardo El dom, 10 ene 2021 a las 14:33, Bernardo () escribió: > The problem of BIND ignoring "packets received correctly" has definitely > something to do

[SOLVED] Re: bind listening on UDP port 53 using 2 fd

o make such a combination of settings work again. Hope this helps someone else to avoid loosing a lot of time. Regards, -- Bernardo El sáb, 23 ene 2021 a las 11:35, Bernardo () escribió: > Hi all, > > Is it normal to see bind listening on UDP port 53 using 2 fd? > > udp UNCONN

bind listening on UDP port 53 using 2 fd

ive clients: 0/900/1000 tcp clients: 0/150 TCP high-water: 1 server is up and running -- Bernardo <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Libre de virus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-

Re: BIND ignores "packets received correctly"

* Simulate a firewall blocking UDP responses bigger than > * 'maxudp' bytes. > */ > if (sock->manager->maxudp != 0 && > cc > (int)sock->manager->maxudp) { >