On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:28:28AM +0300, Mohammed Ejaz wrote:
>
> No this IP 212.76.76.18 doesn’t belongs to us and even not in a
> trusted list of our DNS. After looking at my logs I noticed this IP
> asked for this domain mumbai-m.site to which our name server denied
> as shown in the below lo
On 12/03/11 12:30 AM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> "Linux people and their reinstalls"?!
>
> Somebody has confused Linux with Windows. We've been running RedHat
> Eneterprise Linux (RHEL) systems commercially for several years
> (including our DNS servers) and the only time I "reinstall" is when
> I'm
On 22/11/10 5:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/21/2010 21:58, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>> On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
>>>
>>>> - BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
>>>
>>> Really old, definite
On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
>
>> - BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
>
> Really old, definitely needs upgrading.
That just means they're running RHEL 5 or CentOS 5. If they have a
support contract with Red Hat, they may not be able to upgrade w
ed this on.
Mind you, when the date rolls around we'll have bigger problems when
running systems that are affected by that.
Regards,
Ben
--
Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes
Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant
Encrypted email preferred - primary Op
On 7/10/10 4:42 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
>
> ISC has tried to kill it, but the beast is resilient and won't die.
Maybe we should call it a wombat then ...
> Invocations of nslookup are embedded in thousands of legacy scripts and
> some folks are unable or unwilling to change them.
Nothing quit
On 7/10/10 2:09 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> I can find nothing in the documentation that states such. If I missed
> it, I'd appreciate someone pointing me at it.
I have some vague memory of seeing messages to that effect when using it
on a Solaris system in around 1999. I stopped using it aroun
On 7/10/10 1:47 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> I keep hoping for a BIND distro that upgrades nslookup(1) to:
> print STDERR, "nslookup(1) has been replaced by host(1)\n"; exit 0;
Wasn't nslookup already deprecated about ten years or so ago?
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
On 6/10/10 6:49 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 20:30, Eivind Olsen wrote:
>>
>> I don't think you've mentioned which OS you're running, and whether you run
>> a bundled or self-compiled version of BIND, so I'm not sure where it puts
>> its logs by default. Do you see _any_ mention
9 matches
Mail list logo
