On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:31 PM, R Dicaire wrote:
> Hi folks, just upgraded from 9.4x to 9.6.1, and looking at my
> query.log I'm seeing entries appended with -EC, -ED , -EDC, etc.
> What does this indicate, and where can I read up on what they mean?
https://www.isc.org/files/Bv9.6ARM.pdf
page 41
On 22 Jan 2009 17:09:28 -0500, LENA MATUSOVSKAYA, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN
wrote:
> My goal is for my authoritiative server to use its memory cache to reply to
> the queries its authoritiative for. However, it should not satisfy all other
> queries - NO to recursion ;) . Overall, I'm wondering what
On 1/21/09, Todd Snyder wrote:
> Good day,
Hello,
>
> I am stuggling to get my head around the 512 byte limit with regards to
> DNS queries/responses. I am sure there is much in the RTFM category,
> and I will continue to RTFM, but I wanted to ask a couple of specific
> questions.
>
> 1) I
On 21 Jan 2009 11:55:25 -0500, LENA MATUSOVSKAYA, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN
wrote:
> Hello,
Hello,
>
> Could you pls point me to the documentation explaning the major differences
> between BIND 9.4 and 9.5 releases? I looked at
> https://www.isc.org/downloadables/11 and didn't find that informati
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Chris Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm migrating away from my 12 year old Solaris master DNS server to a
> new Linux based master server. I'm looking for suggestions on how to
> make the transition smooth without any downtime. The IP address of the
> new s
5 matches
Mail list logo