I see your email on the list.
Thank you.
Larry
__
Lawrence Adamiec
Web Developer/UNIX Admin
Information Technology Services (ITS)
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Illinois Institute of Technology
565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL
60661
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:2
hu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
>
> > Using dig @My-NAME-SERVER works. I am not running named on the virtual
> > server using dig @ 127.0.0.1 does not work.
>
> Okay. Then change your /etc/resolv.conf to conta
Hi,
Using dig @My-NAME-SERVER works. I am not running named on the virtual
server using dig @ 127.0.0.1 does not work.
Thank you.
Larry
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> In the virtual server, use dig @a.b.c.d with the IP address of the DNS
> servers you want to use
I had someone at our main campus ensure port 53 is open for this zone. The
zone does have its own IP. Even with opening the ports, I still get time
out errors.
Does anyone have any other ideas?
Thank you.
Larry
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
> I should have s
I should have said it was a Solaris 10 zone (container). I am not using
VirtualBox, VMware, or other third party software.
Larry
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 1:47 PM, "Adamiec, Lawrence"
> wrote:
>
> I a
HI,
I am running BIND 9.6-ESV-R5-P1 on a Solaris 10 server. I can run queries
without specifying a name server on my Solaris servers successfully. When
I try to run a query on a Solaris 10 virtual server, I get "connection
timed out; no servers could be reached" error.
If I add the name servers
I don't get 5 seconds for a reply.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
google.com. 219 IN 2607:f8b0:4009:805::1006
google.com. 29 IN A 173.194.46.34
google.com. 29 IN A 173.194.46.35
google.com. 29 IN A
I must be doing something wrong. I ran queryperf and the results don't
look right, 13 and 23 queries per second? What am I doing wrong? I ran
the queryperf on the same machine that is running BIND. I got similar
results when running against the master server.
I ran the test one right after the
d not time out, people stopped
complaining, and my boss was happy. (I know dig is better).
Unfortunately, I don't remember which sites people were complaining about.
Larry
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:11 AM, wrote:
> "Adamiec, Lawrence" wrote on 11/26/2012
> 01:12:48 PM:
>
&g
Query time: 780 msec
> ;; SERVER: 200.51.197.187#53(200.51.197.187)
> ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 26 19:24:11 2012
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 49
>
>
> *real0m0.799s*
> user0m0.004s
> sys 0m0.016s
> [ec2-user@domU-12-31-39-06-2E-64 ~]$
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> regar
> solved here. The BIND defaults are about as efficient as they can be,
> especially so in later versions.
>
> Doug
>
>
> On 11/26/2012 11:01 AM, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been tasked with authoring a DNS report "to achieve optima
Hi,
I have been tasked with authoring a DNS report "to achieve optimal
performance." The report must include:
CPU usage
memory usage
bandwidth usage
throughput
latency
I have found some information regarding the number of queries processed per
minute but nothing of value for the above areas.
I
2 12:35
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: recursion and forwarding
>
> On 01/12/2012 06:15 PM, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
>
> > So when does recursion occur, before the query is forwarded or
never? I
> > thought recursion was supposed to go looking for the answe
Hi,
I am running one master server and one slave server with BIND 9.6.1-P3.
The global options section on both servers are identical.
In the options section I have,
allow-recursion { ck_domain; };
forwarders { 216.47.128.11; 216.47.128.12; 216.47.143.90; };
The ck_domain ACL c
Here are some results using the same commands you used.
# dig bonsi.org
; <<>> DiG 9.6.1-P3 <<>> bonsi.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 1462
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
Thanks to everyone for the help.
Larry
> > On Sep 21, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Adamiec, Lawrence wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is it possible to have one IP in multiple zone files for forward
lookups? What type of troubles would be encountered?
> > &g
What I am looking at doing is the following.
www.existingdomain.edu 86400 A 192.0.0.1
www.existingdomain.newdomain.edu 86400 A 192.0.0.1
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Warren Kumari [mailto:war...@kumari.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 15:18
> To: Adami
Hi,
Is it possible to have one IP in multiple zone files for forward
lookups? What type of troubles would be encountered?
Larry
Lawrence Adamiec
Unix Manager/Web Support Specialist
Center for Law and Computers
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Illinois Institute of Technology
Room 525B
18 matches
Mail list logo
