Ok. And what are your observations?
Or do you expect us to debug your issue and interpret the outputs you send here
for you?
As a side note, the rndc outputs you are pasting into your emails are mostly
useless to debug memory issues.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and y
I’ve been running for 12+ hours with a max-cache-size of 256M (since I’m on a
machine with 2GB that does a lot of data reduction as it’s a honeypot firewall).
This is what I’ve collected.
+++ Statistics Dump +++ (1749514002)
++ Incoming Requests ++
203077 QUERY
12014
I take it back, it does at the beginning of the manual.
It would be helpful if all references to had links back to the
explanation.
Odd that when you specify a percentage the effective amount is logged by named,
but when you specify an absolute amount it’s not.
> On Jun 8, 2025, at 10:46 P
Actually it does
https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9.20.9/reference.html#term-sizeval
-- Best regards
Sten Carlsen
No improvements come from shouting:
"MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
> On 9 Jun 2025, at 06.47, Philip Prindeville via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> I read:
>
> https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en
4 matches
Mail list logo
