Re: Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-14 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi. That KB article shows you how to use TSIG keys as a view selector for zone transfer. If you want a single DNS server to give different answers to the same question based on client IP then you *could* (though I'm NOT recommending this, especially since it will be deprecated at some point) use "

Re: Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-14 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) Till now I've been using sth. like this for a single private and a single public views: https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-00851 For my clients I provided information on all my resources and recursive resolution, for external ones - about my public hosts and no recursive resolution. Trivial.

Re: Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-14 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi Marek. Please can you show the config that used to work? Please can you also explain why it is desired to create more views? Maybe give an example of what you're trying to achieve. In general, matching views is done top down - test clients against the criteria in the first view. If they don't m

Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-14 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) There are 4 name servers for my domain: two internal ones (my CIDR, managed by me) and two external ones (foreign IP, I have no administrative privileges). I've been using two views: the private one (for my clients, served by my servers) and a public one (for remote clients, served by al

Re: Grief after upgrade to macOS Sequioa 15.4

2025-04-14 Thread Marco Davids (SIDN) via bind-users
For the record: brew update brew upgrade now also does the trick. -- Marco On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 07:06:45 +0200 Daniel Stirnimann via bind-users wrote: Hi Niall, If you use brew, I solved it with this: brew uninstall bind brew cleanup brew install libxml2 export LDFLAGS="-L/opt/homebrew/opt/l