Re: Policy-dnssec timeline step by step

2025-02-20 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Hi, The timings are based on RFC 7583 and "Flexible and Robust Key Rollover in DNSSEC". They may help a great deal in understanding the time states. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7583 https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/publications/satin2012-Schaeffer.pdf See below for inline answers.

Re: Policy-dnssec timeline step by step

2025-02-20 Thread Ondřej Surý
Have you read: https://kb.isc.org/docs/dnssec-key-and-signing-policy and https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dnssec-guide.html This RFC should give you some background too: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6781 Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours and yo

Policy-dnssec timeline step by step

2025-02-20 Thread Nguyen Thi Minh Tam via bind-users
Hi, I'm trying out DNSSEC policy for the first time, and I am so confused about the time states—how they calculate the time for the state of the records to change. I really need help because I have a ton of questions (I'm using BIND 9.18.31, btw). I want to understand how it works step by step,

Re: Access Control Lists error

2025-02-20 Thread Greg Choules via bind-users
Hi. An ACL can match other ACLs, meaning that you can include the name of one ACL in the definition of another. Your config is being interpreted as: acl "tsg_acl" { Start the definition of an ACL called "tsg_acl", which will be followed by a list of things to match, each of which must end with a s

Re: Can Bind report errors through EDE responses?

2025-02-20 Thread Emmanuel Fusté
Hello, Functional EDE 22 is available in Bind 9.20.6. RFC say : 4.23. Extended DNS Error Code 22 - No Reachable Authority The resolver could not reach any of the authoritative name servers (or they potentially refused to reply) Bind does not map a rcode REFUSED to EDE 22 so in your case I don'

Can Bind report errors through EDE responses?

2025-02-20 Thread Danilo Godec via bind-users
Hello, I was testing / debugging some sub-zone delegation for a friend's domain (something about email marketing service that want's their clients to delegate a subzone to their NSs) and couldn't quite see the issue - apart from my local resolver reporting 'SERVFAIL': ; <<>> DiG 9.18.33 <<>