Re: Multi Master/Primary Authoritative DNSSEC DNS Nameserver With Synced/Replicated COMMON Dir/Vol For BIND

2024-09-27 Thread Ondřej Surý
> On 28. 9. 2024, at 1:31, Terik Erik Ashfolk wrote: > > and during consideration i was using a dnssec-policy opPolicy2W with KSK > changing every 20 days, & ZSK every 10 days. > > Now I changed to another dnssec-policy opPolicy3M : KSK changing every ~ 3 > months & ZSK every 22 days. Just d

Re: Multi Master/Primary Authoritative DNSSEC DNS Nameserver With Synced/Replicated COMMON Dir/Vol For BIND

2024-09-27 Thread Terik Erik Ashfolk
Does the BIND have command/parameter for configuring+running BIND in Multi-Signer MODEL-2 mode as specified in RFC 8901 ? https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8901.html in another words, Can BIND itself handle multiple-provider's (aka: multiple-nameserver's) KSKs, ZSKs, DNSKEYs, etc RRsets and cr

Re: Multi Master/Primary Authoritative DNSSEC DNS Nameserver With Synced/Replicated COMMON Dir/Vol For BIND

2024-09-27 Thread Terik Erik Ashfolk
Hi Ondrej. THANK YOU. I understand what you have suggested. I considered that earlier : it would've increased 1 more server rent cost, and additional setup, maintenance/update, etc times, ... and during consideration i was using a dnssec-policy opPolicy2W with KSK changing every 20 days, & ZSK e

Re: Multi Master/Primary Authoritative DNSSEC DNS Nameserver With Synced/Replicated COMMON Dir/Vol For BIND

2024-09-27 Thread Mark Andrews
You need to remember multi-signer still has a lot of hand waving in its specification. All the coordination between operators is unspecified. Things like how you generate CDS automatically is undefined. A pre CDS (PCDS) record with an signer tag and signer count before the CDS data would work

Re: Multi Master/Primary Authoritative DNSSEC DNS Nameserver With Synced/Replicated COMMON Dir/Vol For BIND

2024-09-27 Thread Terik Erik Ashfolk
According to the page https://blog.apnic.net/2021/08/25/multi-signer-dnssec-models/ in MODEL 2. I added an improved image as attachment. MULTI-ZSK-SIGNING IS ONE OF THE SOLUTION, and appears to be suitable for my case. So, multi-signing with ZSKs from multiple nameservers would have worked,