You need to ask FreeIPA people and your vendor (but my guess is that the dyndb plugin provided by RH doesn’t provide this method).--Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.On 8. 7. 20
Running gdb showed that the "not found" comes from this piece of code
isc_result_t
dns_db_getsize(dns_db_t*db, dns_dbversion_t*version, uint64_t*records,
uint64_t*bytes) {
REQUIRE(DNS_DB_VALID(db));
REQUIRE(dns_db_iszone(db));
if(db->methods->getsize!= NULL) {
return((db->methods->getsize)(db, ve
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 7:52 AM Tom Marcoen (EXT) via bind-users
wrote:
>
> I observe the same behaviour. I have similar output for TCP/53 on the
> loopback and public IP addresses. The IP addresses and port numbers are the
> same, but the fd (file descriptors?) are different. I assumed different
On 08-07-2024 13:42, Greg Choules wrote:
Hi Kees.
Hi Greg, thanks for the quick reply.
A few questions:
- What version of BIND are you running?
9.16.23 (in centos that is 32:9.16.23-15.el9)
- How large (number of RRs) are your zones?
My main zone (renamed to example.com) is about 800 RRs (
I observe the same behaviour. I have similar output for TCP/53 on the loopback
and public IP addresses. The IP addresses and port numbers are the same, but
the fd (file descriptors?) are different. I assumed different threads of the
same process.
# named -V | grep ^BIND
BIND 9.18.26 (Extended S
Hi Kees.
A few questions:
- What version of BIND are you running?
- How large (number of RRs) are your zones?
- What is the peak rate of dynamic updates?
- Do you have "max-journal-size" configured to anything?
- Are you perhaps getting short on disc storage in the place where BIND
keeps its files?
Hi,
At the moment I have three FreeIPA systems (replicas), recently
installed with CentOS 9-Stream.
All three of these show this message at irregular intervals.
Jul 03 07:50:44 iparep5.example.com named[541]: zone example.com/IN:
zone_journal_compact: could not get zone size: not found
Jul 03
Hi Robert,
it's the same PID for all lines, parent process is systemd.
The lines in the netstat output are exact duplicates (same IP, port and PID).
Other tools like ss show the same, so it's not a problem with netstat.
It's the same bahaviour on different machines, some upgraded from Debian <
That's correct.
Since BIND 9.16, `named` binds to individual addresses instead of "any" because
it needs to send responses back from the same address and it's just easier this
way.
Cheers,
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do
Some diagnostics is needed. When you reboot, does it show it up multiple binds
to the same port? Can your run netstat -tP to identify the process ID (are
they the same or different). There may also be other options to provide more
diagnostics.
-Trying to determine if you are really binding
Hello,
we have been running some BIND nameservers on Debian-based systems for many
years.
Until (including) Debian 10 with BIND 9.11.5, netstat always showed only one
line
per listening socket, e.g.
tcp0 0 10.x.x.x:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
1234/named
tc
11 matches
Mail list logo