Re: dnssec-validation?

2023-04-13 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 13 Apr 2023, at 19:23, David Carvalho via bind-users > wrote: > > Hello and thank you for the reply. > My domain is "di.ubi.pt". The parent domain "ubi.pt" recently configured > DNSSEC (BIND 9.11) so it was time again for me to try to set it up for my > domain. > > A few months ago I upd

Re: Reverse Policy Zone to make MS Azure stuff work?

2023-04-13 Thread Michael De Roover
Another thing I forgot to mention, is the need to express these parameters in the options clause in named.conf: options { // RPZ zone // Source: https://deteque.com/m3aawg-bind-training/named.conf response-policy { zone "rpz.local"; }; }; My apolog

Re: Reverse Policy Zone to make MS Azure stuff work?

2023-04-13 Thread Mark Andrews
Create a catalog zone and use that to distribute the zone configuration to all your recursive servers. As for using a zone that is not delegated to you. Microsoft own appserviceenvironment.net and are telling you to use it this way. This is no different to the IETF saying you can have your ow

Re: Reverse Policy Zone to make MS Azure stuff work?

2023-04-13 Thread Michael De Roover
On Friday, 14 April 2023 00:28:24 CEST John Thurston wrote: > Due to a requirement to use something Microsoft crafted, we are being > asked to assert (internally) authority over 3rd-level names under > appserviceenvironment.net > > I've pushed back on this, because I don't think it's nice to publi

Reverse Policy Zone to make MS Azure stuff work?

2023-04-13 Thread John Thurston
Due to a requirement to use something Microsoft crafted, we are being asked to assert (internally) authority over 3rd-level names under appserviceenvironment.net I've pushed back on this, because I don't think it's nice to publish "authoritative" answers in domains we have not been delegated.

RE: dnssec-validation?

2023-04-13 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hello and thank you for the reply. Problem 1 - I'll have to investigate further. As for problem 2 ... it's weird. I was working on another thing and now I was checking permissions by your suggestion, when I noticed the files have new timestamp from a while ago. I compared the contents of the updat

Re: dnssec-validation?

2023-04-13 Thread Evan Hunt
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:38:15AM +0100, David Carvalho wrote: > Problem number 1: Dnssec seems to be running on "di.ubi.pt", but > dnssec-validation still needs to be set to no; Will this cause troubles? > Dns2 is set to auto and runs fine. >From here, di.ubt.pt appears to be properly signed and

RE: Fully automated DNSSEC with BIND 9.16

2023-04-13 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hello and thank you for the reply. I can confirm my current dns servers have already EPEL repo enabled and jemalloc package is available. I'll setup my test machine accordingly to be able to install BIND 9.18. Will it also provide named-chroot (is it really necessary?) Thanks! David -Origin

Re: Fully automated DNSSEC with BIND 9.16

2023-04-13 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 13/04/2023 17:17, David Carvalho via bind-users wrote: Hi David, Hello and thanks for the reply. I enabled this repo in Oracle Linux 8 with: dnf copr enable isc/bind Then I tried to install (dnf install isc-bind) but I got: Error: Problem: package isc-bind-1:2-3.el8.x86_64 requires isc-b

RE: Fully automated DNSSEC with BIND 9.16

2023-04-13 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hello and thanks for the reply. I enabled this repo in Oracle Linux 8 with: dnf copr enable isc/bind Then I tried to install (dnf install isc-bind) but I got: Error: Problem: package isc-bind-1:2-3.el8.x86_64 requires isc-bind-bind, but none of the providers can be installed - package isc-bin

Re: Fully automated DNSSEC with BIND 9.16

2023-04-13 Thread Ondřej Surý
> On 13. 4. 2023, at 15:25, David Carvalho via bind-users > wrote: > > I'm using 9.16.23 Just don't. ISC provides packages for major linux distributions (https://www.isc.org/download/), so there's really no reason to shoot yourself into foot to use a random BIND 9 snapshot provided by your di

RE: Fully automated DNSSEC with BIND 9.16

2023-04-13 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hello. Both content and timestamps. I've been told previously here that there is a bug prior to version 9.16.30. I'm using 9.16.23, no update available yet. No, not removing 😉 Regards David -Original Message- From: bind-users On Behalf Of Jan-Piet Mens Sent: 13 April 2023 11:12 To: bind

RE: dnssec-validation?

2023-04-13 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hello again. Problem number 1: Dnssec seems to be running on "di.ubi.pt", but dnssec-validation still needs to be set to no; Will this cause troubles? Dns2 is set to auto and runs fine. Problem number 2: How can I avoid the key regeneration (using version 9.16.23) every named restart? Kind regar

Re: Fully automated DNSSEC with BIND 9.16

2023-04-13 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
1. Everytime I restart the service, it seems all these files are recreated. How did you observe this? Just by file timestamps or actual content? And just to be sure to ask the obvious: you are not manually removing these files are you? :) -JP -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listi

RE: dnssec-validation?

2023-04-13 Thread David Carvalho via bind-users
Hello and thank you for the reply. My domain is "di.ubi.pt". The parent domain "ubi.pt" recently configured DNSSEC (BIND 9.11) so it was time again for me to try to set it up for my domain. A few months ago I updated both dns servers to Oracle Linux 8, running BIND 9.16.23 to prepare for this. The

Re: RPZ zone response delay time ?

2023-04-13 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Fri, 2023-04-07 at 17:27 +0100, Jason Vas Dias wrote: > > *.google-analytics.com A 0.0.0.0 > *.clarity.ms A 0.0.0.0 > *.adtelligent.com A 0.0.0.0 > >   (there are over 15,000 entries in it). > >   This serves to speed up my internet accesses about 10 times, >   normally, and acts great as an